495
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by moss@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

When given a choice between a millitary industrial neoliberal with a rainbow voting base and a fascist who is one elon musk golf session away from banning HRT, the best option is certainly not to refuse to play out of protest

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Not if they were gonna vote trump instead

[-] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Literally no. If they were gonna vote Trump instead but decided to go with Harris, their vote is worth the same as someone who would always vote Harris or the vote of a leftist who decided on damage reduction.

Any voting system flattens our personal motivations into a single action. Any statement you're looking to make is moot unless you have a massive campaign to make it clear outside of the ballot box. Even then, the establishment can downplay and misinterpret your motivation as not being representative or as less important than what they want to believe.

There's no better way to translate our will into results. Any system that doesn't use free and fair voting can be tainted and colored by bias, making it impossible to ever undermine the will of the establishment. They will always choose to believe whatever is most convenient, but votes can deliver a reality shock that forces them to adjust their behavior, even if they never change their minds. The only other thing capable of that is violence.

this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
495 points (95.9% liked)

196

16730 readers
2343 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS