politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
It's like an incredibly predictable consequence of the same mistakes U.S. officials have been making over and over since the 1900s
The US was literally training these guys to fight Boko Haram and ISIS, not for taking over other countries, militant groups and threats from unstable neighbors are a very real threat for the people of Niger, so by your logic just let a bunch of marauding assholes continue to be a plague upon the continent and Niger specifically?
Doctors and teachers and election administrators we teach can't turn around and shoot the hospitals schools and community centers you gave them at you, can't say the same about soldiers and weapons.
Also, our military presence in the area drew in/recruited way more terrorists to the region than we were ever able to neutralize
GTFO, lol, so by that logic the US had a military presence in Rwanda during the genocide? What about Sudan (whom is not US allies but Russian)? What about all of these many other examples? You might as well have just commented "US bad" and it still would have been as factually correct.
Oh the US doesn't help train and assist doctors and teachers in Africa? Election Administrators?
As an American you should be embarrassed at how little you know about how your tax money is being spent to help the world grow to become a better place.
Neo-Colonialism. The U.S. isn’t just doing it for “freedom.” They expect things in return. Whether profits from resource extraction, or just to prevent Russia/ China gaining a foothold.
Also, when the US trained soldier tells the US trained doctor, "We've gotta look like we're fighting terrorism if we want to keep getting money from the US, so hand over anyone who comes into your hospital from the wrong neighborhood and we'll practice those enhanced interrogation techniques on them," the net effect for the US's image is a negative one. When we go looking for terrorism and say we're handing out lots of resources to anyone who will help us find terrorism, we just end up finding a lot of "terrorism" and creating a lot of terrorists.