Chapotraphouse

14328 readers

438 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net

Thordros@hexbear.net

I am really conflicted (hexbear.net)

submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I wasted 6 hours arguing with a libertarian. But I did succeed in arguing him into submission, where he started accepting that his worldview is wrong. His only defense of himself is that "I haven't read anything about objectivism, I think they might prove property rights and markets there..."

I should probably get a real life.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] JohnBrownsBussy2@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It is very funny to me that you ran into a libertarian so malformed that they haven't even read Rand. Where they a Rothbardian, a Hoppean, or did they get their political "education" from memes?

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He claimed to be both Rothbardian and Hoppean. While exclusively invoking John Locke's conception of property. Really confidently incoherent.

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago

probably youtube radicalized. He tried to back his arguments by citing bullshit youtube videos.