this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
736 points (99.2% liked)

News

38569 readers
1482 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Humans have quite literally invented cars that are better at killing people, especially children.

"I don't want children to die in accidents," say people as they drive huge masses of metal that might do just that.

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'll keep driving my PEV Minivan that has 360 cameras and I can see in front of me easily. I care about children's lives, unlike bubba in his lifted pickup truck. Why do you need a 4x4 lifted 3 feet and you live in the suburbs?

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 3 points 2 years ago

Why do you need a 4x4 lifted 3 feet and you live in the suburbs?

Penis issue

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] cogman@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yes, but mini vans aren't lifted 20 ft off the ground with absurdly huge hoods for no apparent reason.

The reason trucks and SUVs are killing kids is because you can see a 4ft tall person that isn't standing 100 yards in front. These are the only vehicles with this problem.

[–] niucllos@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

Additionally, the raised and blunt hood height makes a full-body impact with no force dissipation much more likely, particularly for shorter people, where a more traditional hood shape allows a struck pedestrian to roll over the top and avert some of the force of the strike

[–] dafo@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

But it's still blocking the view for us in normal sizes cars.

I don't know how many times I've had to hope for the best and carefully inch forwards/backwards when being next to a minivan/SUV/pickup. I've been close to being in an accident a number of times because of, well mostly, SUVs.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

20-foot lifted vehicles would probably be considerably safer:

  1. They'd easily have the clearance to safely navigate over most pedestrians in their path.
  2. Any attempts to balance them well would be incredibly expensive and you'd likely have many drivers whose cars would fall over from insufficiently sized tires or whatever.

Hmmm... 🤔 Now that I think about it, maybe we should subsidize these lift kits to make this a self-solving problem

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Driving a truck and not wanting children to die in accidents are in-fact not in conflict with each other. Or are you implying that truck drivers do want them to die?

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Driving a truck and not wanting children to die in accidents are in-fact not in conflict with each other.

Then design trucks which are not as deadly to pedestrians on impact.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Large vehicles are inherently going to be more dangerous to pedestrians than cars. If you make a truck the size of a car then it no longer functions in the role it was intented for. Why is everyone so focused on trucks anyway? The nose height on most vans is compareable and on semi trucks it double the height of a pickup yet nobody seems to be complaining about those.

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

The convenience of drivers is not more important than human lives.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Cars kill people every year. Trains and buses too. Ban those as well?

[–] Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the strawman, I can burn it for fuel when winter comes.

I see that you reference Sam Harris in a recent post. Thank you for making it clear that you're not worth listening to, bye.

[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Blocking is always a good way to avoid needing to explain the contradictions in one's reasoning.

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, but it clearly isn't important enough to them to influence their choice.

[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you think people should not buy trucks because they might be in the 0.1% of truck drivers who end up killing a pedestrian with it? What about the people who have a legitimate use for the bed?

[–] Krzd@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No, they shouldn't because even in vehicle to vehicle collisions SUVs kill 4 times more people than cars. Source
The people that have a legitimate use for such trucks should be required to apply for a exception and/or have a CDL.
Because in fact almost no one actually needs those trucks. Source [1]
Most people can use a trailer or rent a truck for the 1-2 times per year they need it.

[1] I work at a hardware store, specifically in the construction materials department. In 2 years of working there I had literally 1 person use their truck bed to haul a pallet of concrete bags, everyone else either used vans or a trailer. And just 2 weeks ago I had the first customer that used a pickup truck (Mercedes X-Class) to tow a 2.5t trailer to transport paving slabs.
So no, even trades people don't need those trucks, so why the fuck should a normal "civilian" have those and be 4 times as likely to kill someone??