132
submitted 1 month ago by girlfreddy@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world

New Hampshire social workers ignored a litany of warning signs that a 5-year-old girl was being physically abused by her father prior to the child’s death, the slain girl’s mother alleged in a negligence lawsuit filed Friday against the state.

Crystal Sorey says the state’s Division for Children, Youth and Families failed to act on numerous reports from multiple people about Harmony Montgomery’s welfare after father Adam Montgomery was awarded custody of the girl in February 2019.

Adam Montgomery was sentenced in May to a minimum of 56 years in prison after he was convicted of murdering his daughter and moving her corpse around for months before disposing of it. Police believe Harmony was killed by him nearly two years before she was reported missing in 2021. Her body was never found.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] foggy@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I think without knowing why she lost the child, it's not right to call her a victim before the child. For all you know, she was worse than him. Which, stands to reason.

Until I know, there is one victim. Your stance is conjecture. Mine is withholding judgement with reason. I won't go into gender politics of custody and why there are red flags to begin with here; until we know why she lost custody to this (now) clear piece of shit and not to foster care...

There is one victim (dead child). And one culprit (the state).

Should the mother have been a decent mother, drug addicted but loving and providing, not abusive, etc, the there are two victims, and two counts against the state.

I am not going to jump to conclusions, especially when the available evidence (the fact that she lost custody to a deadbeat lunatic) suggests otherwise.

The mother could equally be a perpetrator or a victim. We don't know yet.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I am not going to jump to conclusions

You already did.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

No, I have remained purposely impartial.

Protip, don't try and become a lawyer.

We have no evidence to sway us between "mom was worse than dad" and "mom is a victim". (In fact the available evidence suggests mom was so bad that dads psychopathic character didn't shine through as less safe from Mom than foster care. I've been generous to Mom given this and, again, not going into gender politics of custody battles...).

I understand you're trying to be empathetic. I'm trying to preserve justice for a tortured, dead child. Until we don't know mom wasnt worse, we remain impartial.

You may be right, mom may be a victim. But you may be doing a dead child a severe disservice. Withhold your judgement without facts present, please.

Was Dad's cousin the DA? that changes things. We dont know. And until we do, we examine the available evidence.

Until more evidence is presented publicly, mom is not a victim. That doesn't mean she can't be, and I have left that window open. On purpose.

The known victim is a dead child. We proceed with respect to known victims so as to remain impartial.

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

I used to be an investigator for a child and family services agency.

Please stop trying to tell me who is a victim and who isn't.

[-] foggy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

There is one victim here until we know more.

Stick to child services and dont get into law.

this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
132 points (98.5% liked)

News

23260 readers
2860 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS