316
submitted 2 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

Admiral Rob Bauer, who serves as the principal advisor to NATO's secretary general, also said that nations supplying weapons to Kyiv have the right to limit their use.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/aZWt4

SpinScore: https://spinscore.io/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.euronews.com%2F2024%2F09%2F15%2Fnato-chair-backs-ukraines-use-of-long-range-weapons-to-strike-inside-russia

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Riffraffintheroom@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

I’d say we’re about to enter the cool zone, but I feel like we’ve been here for a while. Guess we’re entering the cool zone’s cool zone.

[-] lemmyseizethemeans@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 2 months ago

I mean how cool can it get? Sunglasses at night in a Ferrari submersed in an Olympic swimming pool?

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Very unlikely. There was a possibility early on that Putin would decide to go out with a fiery bang of glory, but time passed and nothing happened. He might threaten use of nukes, but won't actually use them for fear of retaliation. The whole fucking point of nuclear weapons was deterrence until the brain-dead US decided to actually use them. One can hope the world learned their lesson.

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 22 points 2 months ago

There was a possibility early on that Putin would decide to go out with a fiery bang of glory,

When? That sounds like a very silly assessment

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 months ago
[-] RISC_Xi@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Why are you presenting it as a fact when the article says

Movements of planes used by top Kremlin officials show Putin may be in a hideaway near Surgut in western Siberia, it is claimed.

Also "it is claimed" by the Ukrainian side. Do you have any Russian sources to corroborate this?

[-] BrikoX@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I stated my opinion and linked to the article that supports that assertion. If Russia was unhappy with that "claim" they could have refuted it by a simple image or video, which they didn't do.

Do you have any Russian sources to corroborate this?

Lack of refuting from Russia is confirmation of that being the case in my eyes. If you need a detailed response from Russia's spokesperson, then there isn't one.

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 23 points 2 months ago

I'm sorry, but I've seen a lack of refutation on your part that you have sex with couches, which is confirmation of that being the case in my eyes

[-] RISC_Xi@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago

linked to the article that supports that assertion

It doesn't support that assertion at all. It's highly speculative based on flight movements and a lack of response from russia lol

Also if you take lack of response from the other side as a confirmation, then oh boy have you checked what the RT and TASS are saying about the war?

[-] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
316 points (97.0% liked)

Interesting Global News

2626 readers
226 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS