this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
110 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13920 readers
686 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thallo@hexbear.net 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (17 children)

I'm just gonna leave this here

smuglord @lemmy.ee

[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 37 points 9 months ago (11 children)

If we're to believe that the entire north has no electricity outside pyongyang then the libs need to explain why the country has 80% smartphone ownership, where the mobile phone infrastructure for that comes from and where the electricity everyone charges their phones on comes from too.

[–] TheDoctor@hexbear.net 15 points 9 months ago (5 children)

So what’s with the pictures? Are there just less people? Or less light pollution for some reason?

[–] ComradeMonotreme@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Nearly every photo showing the DPRK as having no lights at night is fake to some degree.

Now it is important to know that the North and Eastern parts of the DPRK are very mountainous so you are only going to see light on the Western/North West Coastal side mostly. That's because that's where all the people are.

But generally the pictures shown are from when there are blackouts, which still happen being a country under embargo, but it's not all the time. Secondly they are usually composites, so they've combined multiple blackouts to make it look like there's no lights. It like if you overlapped a whole lot of satellite photos post hurricanes and storms in the USA to suggest the USA was worse off in those regions.

Also photoshop and other exaggeration measures.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)