507
submitted 3 months ago by some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

On July 17, the inspector found "green algal growth" in a puddle of standing water in a raw holding cooler. And on July 27, an inspector noted clear liquid leaking out from a square patch on the ceiling. Behind the patch, there were two other patches that were also leaking. An employee came and wiped the liquid away with a sponge, but it returned within 10 seconds. The employee wiped it again, and the liquid again returned within 10 seconds. Meanwhile, a ceiling fan mounted close by was blowing the leaking liquid onto uncovered hams in a hallway outside the room.

A picture of hell.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago
[-] beefpig@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago

By purchasing meat from companies like this, you absolutely are. Support your local butcher if you do consume.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 months ago

you are stretching the definition of support to meaninglessness.

[-] beefpig@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago

By giving them your money, you are funding the operation of the plants that produce the meat. And lining the pockets of those that make the decisions to act this way. It is not meaningless.

If you don’t give them money, it hurts their bottom line and forces either change or the shutting down of the business. You can speak volumes through making more ethical decisions about where your money goes.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 3 months ago

By giving them your money, you are funding the operation of the plants that produce the meat

most people don't give money to BoarsHead. they give it to a grocer.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago

You can speak volumes through making more ethical decisions about where your money goes.

no matter what i buy at the grocery store, my money goes to the grocer.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 months ago

If were being pedantic, if you purchase with a card your money actually goes to the bank, who transfers it to Visa, who transfers it to the grocer. The grocer restocks the item you purchased, transferring a portion of your money (less all the upstream overhead/fees) to the manufacturer of your purchased good.

If people stop buying products with a harmful supply chain, grocers stop stocking it. They're not just putting processed deli meat on the shelves because they think meat bricks look cool.

[-] Malfeasant@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

To be super pedantic, no, ownership of your money never transfers to visa. When your card is swiped (tapped, whatever) visa (or mc or Amex or whoever else) facilitates communication between your bank and the merchant's bank, but no money moves yet. At the end of the day the merchant settles out those transactions, but that's still just data. The money moves typically a day or two later, and that is done directly between the customer and merchant's bank. Source: worked in credit card processing for ~9 years.

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

TIL! thanks for that!

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago

The grocer restocks the item you purchased, transferring a portion of your money (less all the upstream overhead/fees) to the manufacturer of your purchased good.

they can choose not to do that. it's not as though they literally re-order every product the moment they sell a unit.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Somebody walks the aisles at 10 pm every night scanning the out of stocks.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 3 months ago

aren't they responsible for their own actions?

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 months ago

Chain grocery stores don't really allow individual branches to all follow different policies.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

people can always choose to do otherwise. you dont lose free will when you clock in.

[-] WamGams@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

... i don't even know how to respond to that because I'm not sure if itself is a response to what I said.

[-] beefpig@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago

“they can choose not to do that. it's not as though they literally re-order every product the moment they sell a unit.”

No shit. Most stock systems just remove that item from current inventory, and when it gets too low it triggers a reorder request.

Corporations do not abide by ethics. They do not care about anything but increasing profits. So not buying certain things causes stock to sit, and in this case expire. That hurts their bottom line, and so it is more likely to trigger change in the form of them no longer stocking said item to sell. Are you really this dense?

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -2 points 3 months ago

calling me names doesn't change whether i'm responsible for others' actions.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 months ago

If people stop buying products with a harmful supply chain, grocers stop stocking it.

this isn't causal, and the grocers can choose to stop stocking it for any reason or no reason.

[-] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 months ago

They’re not just putting processed deli meat on the shelves because they think meat bricks look cool.

whatever their reason, it's their choice, not mine.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
507 points (98.5% liked)

News

23649 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS