751

submitted 2 months ago by Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] pixelscript@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

On the other hand, if you average the Sun's energy generation across its entire volume and adjust for that volume's mass, an equivalent mass of human body tissue generates more heat energy.

So your eyes may not have the raw lumen output of an entire star; but, pound for pound, your eyes would outshine a similarly massive piece of one.

[-] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

i kinda do no get it, can you explain it in some other way?

like, 100 kilos of sun would generate less heat energy than 100 kilos of me?

[-] pixelscript@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

Yes. On average.

If you specifically take 100 kilos of core material from the Sun, then it would be a no contest victory for the Sun. But the Sun is very, very big, and when it comes to producing energy, most of it is doing absolutely nothing. So it brings the average energy production per kilo way, way down.

[-] addictedtochaos@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

thanks, i think i got it! average matter of the sun has less energy density or IR radiation or what have you, than average matter of me. thannks! that will come in händi as trivia.