News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
I prefer just black coffee. No milk, sugar.
Out of all chain coffee places (in the UK, so costa/nero etc), starbucks has the worst tasting coffee
This goes into great detail about exactly why Starbucks coffee is so shitty.
And if you guessed a big part of it is about saving money, you win the teddy bear.
https://coffeeinformer.com/starbucks-coffee/
Same thing goes for tea. Lipton is super bitter. Imported teas from london don't get bitter regardless of how long they are steeped. They actually taste and smell galaxies different than that "generic bitter tea smell" that much of the world is conditioned to.
As the son of a Londoner (but in the U.S.), I agree 100%. That said, I've switched to Irish teas because they're stronger.
Yes, true of most any national/international chain.
It's because they value large volume, year round availability, and high consistency from their beans and roasts, so that no matter what location you go to it tastes exactly the same.
To do that, they select and blend several bland varieties of coffee bean, put them through an aggressive industrial cleaning and drying (which reduces the natural fruity and funky flavors but minimizes costs) then roast them in huge batches to several steps past where a normal roaster would stop for a given roast (a darker roast gets rid of more of the unique flavors of the coffee cherry and brings out more uniform roast flavors instead).
Again, not something exclusive to Starbucks at all, and plenty of small coffee shops don't bother with the hassle and just buy cheap bulk coffee pre-roasted by large scale operations and will have similar results.
But man, when you get coffee made in small batches, with natural processing or even fermentation and gently roasted... It's an entirely different experience.
It's just weird that any chain would opt for consistently awful instead of just settling for slight variations. It's also weird that people still buy it despite the fact it is objectively and consistently bad.
People who are going to Starbucks often aren't drinking black coffee. They get some sugar, cream, and flavor combo such that the coffee is barely noticeable. It is coffee for people who don't like coffee.
I don't mean any offense but it sounds like that's what you're missing. People don't seem to value taste as their number 1 concern. Probably convenience of some kind (or the fact that they are everywhere). Sounds like SB is having trouble at the moment, but they've had the same shitty coffee for forever and they've done alright previously.
People tend to value consistency of flavors a lot more than you seem to realize. Having something taste exactly how you expect it to is very comforting even if the taste isn't that good. That's basically the whole reason McDonald's stays in business.
Any time you blend beans from different places together, you get a bland coffee. I don't think any mega size coffee shop can ever beat locals just because scale demands won't allow non-blended beans in the supply chain.
Their coffee in the U.S. is the worst too IMO, aside from the occasional awful gas station coffee and I wouldn't be shocked if they were buying Starbucks roast since they also sell it in bags in supermarkets. But, of course, it's like McDonald's- no matter where you go, you know what it will taste like. So people rely on it.
I avoid it as much as I possibly can (it doesn't help that I used to work on a show in L.A. that was partially sponsored by Starbucks and it was that or our other sponsor, Red Bull, if I wanted caffeine while working). The only times I go when I'm not traveling and have to make a caffeine pit stop and there are no other options is when all the other local coffee places are already closed since they all close earlier than Starbucks and I want to sit somewhere not at home to do something.
Other than that, I always go local. And here, a lot of the local places have drive-throughs, so even that convenience Starbucks offers is unnecessary. They're usually cheaper than Starbucks too. And, of course, better coffee.
McDonald's coffee is awesome.
That's what I hear, but I'd rather go to a local place. I always try to support local businesses over chains when possible. Even if it's just a place I'm visiting, I'd rather support their local coffee chain than put more money in McDonald's or Starbucks coffee. And I've discovered a lot of really nice places to hang out that way.
I wholly agree, but if you're not in a headspace where you're able to "deal with" searching out a local shop in a new area, and just need something good and predictable wherever you are, McD's coffee definitely fulfills that need.
That does make sense. Especially when traveling on an interstate and you just need a pit stop. I might do that instead of Starbucks in those situations from now on. Thanks!
Their coffee might be bad but people like them for their other drinks, or fancy coffees.
Yeah, but the fancy coffees taste bad too, because of the bad coffee. The other drinks can be okay though.
McDonald's has better tasting coffee than Starbucks since they swiped Tim Horton's vendor a few years ago.
In the US, it is mediocre. I wouldn't say it is terrible and if I am in a different city that lacks local shops, I'll get it. But it is definitely not my first or even 10th choice. And no, the light and medium blends do taste burnt like everyone and their mother thinks it is cool to say. Those people are almost certainly getting dark roast.
Luckily I live in Seattle and have no issue finding good roasters and cafés that are not anti union.
I've enjoyed many a cup of Starbucks coffee in the past, but I've also tasted Starbucks side-by-side with fancy coffees, and it doesn't even taste like coffee in that context, more like water that has had charred wood steeped in it. I think it must have gotten worse over time.
The lighter roasts may be better by the standards of lighter roasts, but I much prefer darker roasts, so I want them done right. Fortunately I also live in Seattle.