2074
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The disapproval of Elon Musk is the top reason Tesla Model 3 owners are selling their electric vehicles and going for another brand, according to a new survey of 5,000 Model 3 owners.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] CodingSquirrel@kbin.social 170 points 10 months ago

If I already had a Tesla I don't know that I'd sell it because of him, but he was one of the major factors in me not even considering them when I was shopping for my EV. The other reasons being shoddy quality control, shitty practices, and dumb design decisions. All of which probably stem from him anyway.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 56 points 10 months ago

I'd be looking to sell it, specifically because of him.

The willingness for him to make executive decisions to fuck people using his platforms is what frightens me. He'll cut starlink for people he doesn't like. He'll snipe twitter accounts of people he doesn't like.

Since Teslas can be remotely force fed new updates, I genuinely believe it's just a matter of time before he starts fucking with peoples cars. I expect as a way to use Tesla owners as pawns to apply political pressure in areas w/ high ownership that enact tax policy he doesn't like.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

My friends already sold their Teslas a few months ago.

It was such a wild ride watching them go, "Surely he's not serious" to "I'm embarrassed to drive this".

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

I wouldn't doubt he'd try that, but if he did he'd be in for a world of hurt since people need their cars to get to work. I imagine the government wouldn't take kindly to people's 5 digit dollar purchased not working on the whims of a crazy billionaire.

[-] Windex007@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It doesn't have to be as blatant as turning them off. Just garnishing features. Nerfing sentinel, range, top speed, etc.

I can almost hear the bullshit. "X state's lithium recycling tax policy means we have to limit discharge to 80% to avoid premature battery degredation. Drivers may notice a range reduction but it is required to operate within this new regulatory environment"

[-] CharlestonChewbacca@lemmy.world 41 points 10 months ago

Yeah, if my car was beyond repair tomorrow and I needed a new one, I'd be getting either a Hyundai Ioniq 6 or a Silverado EV. A few years ago, I would've been leaning toward the Model 3.

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I really want a bolt euv but I’m put off by them cancelling and then uncancelling it. I’m worried what will happen when they stop making the car (and therefore parts for it) a year or two after I bought it…

[-] reallynotnick@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

No car is made forever, even a next generation isn't going to use the same parts and this has regularly happened with cars when they make new generations, it's not a new problem.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Hyundai Ioniq 6

Please don't buy that one due to significant safety concerns with the i-pedal driving mode feature https://youtu.be/U0YW7x9U5TQ

[-] CharlestonChewbacca@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago
[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

THANK GOD. Also thank you for sharing this information. That fact scared the actual shit out of me

[-] CharlestonChewbacca@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, hopefully other EV designers learn from this.

[-] stankmut@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Just don't use one pedal mode.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

So. What's your plan here exactly? Are you just going to tell all of the owners don't use that feature or ?

[-] stankmut@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm saying if you want an EV6 and you don't care about one pedal driving, then you don't have to worry about that problem. It's an optional driving mode that I personally don't use since I dislike it.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

While I understand your perspective I don't think you're seeing mine.

I understand I don't have to use that feature, I'm concerned about the (now fixed) safety violation the feature presents by not indicating that someone is breaking when those drivers who want to use it choose to do so.

Simply saying "don't use it" only fixes it in one instance.

[-] CharlestonChewbacca@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm concerned about it too, but telling people "don't buy it" isn't any more helpful than saying "don't use this feature."

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I see my failure, I thought I included "until it's fixed" in my original statement. That's what I get for posting during work

[-] flipht@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Same. I had to get a new car recently. Prices were crazy and I wish I had gone with a new instead of a used. But Tesla was off the list from the beginning. I figured I'd wait one more car to get electric. Should be in a new place by then where I can install a home charger too, and the prices will probably be drastically lower by the time my current car dies again.

[-] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

teslas were cool when they were the only practical electric cars, especially sports cars. but that's no longer true and it's becoming less so every year. may as well get a mach-e or a ioniq and ditch muskyboy

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2023
2074 points (97.4% liked)

News

21656 readers
4709 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS