24
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by BlueMonday1984@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago

And, fundamentally, this technology really isn’t that exciting. 

I’m sorry, it isn’t. The *idea of a *“super smart friend that knows everything about me” is exciting, as is the idea of automating away drudgery — spreadsheets and documents, for example. Yet, generative AI doesn’t actually do these things. Putting aside any feelings I may have, it has not changed my life, a guy who loves using technology and is willing to put hours into finding solutions to automate or mitigate problems in his life. 

I don’t know a single person — I have literally never met or spoken to one — that has meaningfully changed their workflow or life as a result of generative AI outside of being able to integrate it to speed up some processes in already-existing systems. 

Nothing about this was real. It’s a farce. The promises of artificial intelligence will not be kept through the pursuit of generative AI, as generative AI is a dead-end technology that has peaked, one that costs too much — both financially and socially — to keep it going.

Yep. Pretty much everyone I know and whose opinion I respect said this at the outset. It’s like watching a virtual carnival of con men roll through town, feeding on everyone else, before moving on to the next town.

I mean, we all tried to tell the “leaders” and “decision makers” but. Money clouds judgement. And this was a LOT of money.

this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1485 readers
153 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS