195
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fartington@lemm.ee 68 points 3 months ago

Elect Harris and watch the right lose their minds worse than when a black man was president.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

In the thumbnail… is she wearing a tan suit?

Oh yes.
This would be awesome.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

It was a white suit that she spilled Dijon mustard on.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

You can already smell the indignation Fox News is cooking up

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Imagine if they caught her with her feet on the desk! Gasp! Horror! Shock!

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Was she doing a latte salute at the time?

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 months ago

Would be cool, but 1) doubt they would do a ticket with two women, unfortunately. This is already a massive gambit, they will need to do everything they can to keep/get more votes, and imo, that means a man (preferably with name recognition) for VP pick.

And, 2) VP is a toothless, essentially useless position. I think it would be a mistake to take AOC away from her home district for 4 to 8 years just for her to do nothing meaningful. We need her in our legislative branch right now.

[-] Tom_Hanx_Hail_Satan@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

AOC's district is dark blue. It won't effect the votes much. It would raise AOCs profile if she has ambitions for POTUS but that's so many hypotheticals.

The most immediate impact is that it would motivate the base. Dems need voter turnout to win. 2 women lashing the Republicans over abortion rights is a winner imo on top of AOCs popularity with the base. There are sound reasons for it. Not saying I think it's a good idea though.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 months ago

She is a unique voice in Congress that cannot just be replaced by some generic Democrat.

I would feel absolutely terrible to doom her to the position of VP. Nobody of her talents, charisma, convictions, etc. should ever be made to become irrelevant as a VP. It's a curse.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org -2 points 3 months ago

Trump is elected: we descend into a fascist hellhole. A woman of color is elected, they probably start a civil war. We are fucked.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

A woman of color is elected, they probably start a civil war. We are fucked.

I’m not scared of Y’all Qaeda. Let them fucking try.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Nah. Those greasy fucks would get obliterated.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org -4 points 3 months ago

You sure about that when a metric shitton of cops and military support Trump?

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

the US armed forces would never organize against the majority of civilians.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Produce some data that argues in your favor and I’ll consider worrying. I don’t think the MAGAts can organize a militia that would rival even the DC police.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It's not the unorganized yokels I'm worried about, but all the Trumpers already embedded in our forces. It's a thing for fascists to infect agencies and organizations able to legally dish out violence.

Sorry if I'm not as confident in the institutions of the US as everybody else.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

I think Jan 6th mostly deflated that risk. The police might stir some shit but most service people have a pretty strong pride in us being a democracy. Trump has shown he doesn't respect the democratic process and so a coup is unlikely.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
195 points (84.7% liked)

politics

19098 readers
4410 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS