wabasso

joined 1 month ago
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago

I’m fairly confident you and the person you’re replying to are on the same page. Drop the word “artificial” in their post and nothing conflicts with what you’ve said.

They have made a call to action to reject the societal norm, that they are not oblivious to, and hope that it goes via the first of the two scenarios you gave.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is there an equivalent to TwoXChromo here?

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those are the features I’m most interested in. Do you have a tutorial / resource you can recommend?

The man pages are, as with most Linux, technically sufficient. Just very hard to digest if I don’t have four hours of interrupted time.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Can you elaborate? Are there a lot of security holes in systemd? (Genuine question)

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did the (anti)protagonist shape shift that much in Phlebas? And even then would it have been a problem for the series? Money no object after all…

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I hated it for being a clip show.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Going to look into this, thanks!

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Like “not E2E”, or someone can guess the URL to your DM type of insedure?

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Ok this discussion reminds me of a gripe: Is there a Linux distribution or kernel that prioritizes the UI over everything else, including an OOM situation?

I’ve never had (modern) Windows kernel panic on me, or completely slow to the point I can’t get Ctrl+Alt+Del registered.

Let me know if I’m just using Linux stupidly though…

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah and also if the school really doesn’t care about it getting back to the rightful owner, they should just throw everything out.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sorry can you elaborate? Are you saying this post is apologetic of the Chinese platform’s censorship? I took it to be critical of both.

Edit: nevermind I see all the apologists in this thread now. And it’s also fair to criticize the OP for casually comparing the two platforms as if they are equally evil.

[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

It sounds like you know what I was getting at. I recognize the danger women are up against and ultimately, even for trivial things, dating is a “free market” where everyone is allowed to ditch on a dime. I’ll defend that more strongly than my point above.

I do object to the accusation I’m advocating for men making decisions on behalf of women. I meant my comment to apply for any combination of sexes/genders.

The armchair theory I’m working from here is that the quantity of potential dates provided by online dating has changed the landscape in a way where people are less incentivized to give second chances. That helps some in some situations, hurts others in others. I just wanted to put a thought out there to not stray too far to one extreme of “anything that might correlate with them being a bad date is an immediate dealbreaker, because there are ten thousand other swipes waiting for me”.

view more: next ›