viking

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] viking@infosec.pub 15 points 5 days ago

A secondary device can't be identified by kernel level anti-cheat either. If you have a standalone device that identifies as a USB keyboard and mouse and then generates inputs that give you a 100% headshot count, there's nothing you could detect through the kernel, since all it detects are keystrokes and clicks.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 8 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Their target market must be in the double digits! And I'm not talking relative.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Nah they want to attack whoever they feel like without having to go through a meeting.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 6 days ago

Sounds like it's only affecting TCP and TLS, so VPN over UDP would be a quick fix.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 6 days ago

Works just fine if you put your phone in desktop mode.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Facebook works perfectly fine in browser, there's literally no need for that shit app.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Only the king or queen (if rightful heir to the throne) is immune, in accordance with article 5 of the Norwegian codex.

The king does have the right to pardon criminals though. He doesn't exactly seem to be very fond of the kid though, and is generally seen as a very just man and close to the people.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 25 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Sounds like the attack scenario is very sophisticated and targeted, and only works within the range of Bluetooth low energy (BLE) connectivity, so 10-15 meters under best circumstances. At that point they might as well eavesdrop on my calls in person.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 12 points 1 week ago

GDPR. First time opening a European website? German ones like this are particularly transparent (by law, not choice).

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter, you need the report as proof for the chargeback.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 22 points 1 week ago (12 children)

I hope you did report the matter to the police regardless?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

I'd say yes, since you want a uniform temperature across your brews. If you do them back to back the different might be minimal, but if there's more time in between, you could get notable differences. Maybe give it a try and measure the temperature drop over time?

 

Hi all,

Need to pick your brains for a bit regarding best practices for handling of account recovery issues while traveling.

Premise would be that my phone gets lost or stolen, and I may not have easy access to my laptop either, and being in a foreign country I couldn't easily get a copy of the original SIM to restore via OTP.

Consequently, I also don't really love the idea of using some password manager with a master password and no F2A.

Under those circumstances, what would you consider the best way forward to ensure accessibility without crippling myself in the process?

The only thing I can come up with is a random subdomain on one of my domains, with random username and random password, where I store an encrypted container containing txt-files. Maybe even further obscured with a random cypher (all numbers / letters shifted x positions to the right or something).

But there's gotta be other use-cases out there, so I was wondering what you are using?

Ideally something that doesn't involve another person.

Thanks!

 

Hi all,

I've got a bit of a spam issue that isn't solved by either keyword or actual spam filter. The problem is that I'm in China and mass email marketing here is acceptable for some reason, so local spam filters don't catch the perps, and international ones are useless based on the language.

And since I'm in a customer/supplier facing role, quite a few genuine mails use the same keywords as the spammers, so that doesn't work to fix my problem.

However, the mails are usually sent to hundreds of people at once, all with their mail addresses in plain view in CC.

So I'd just like to set up a filter to send mails with >100 recipients or something like that straight to trash, but can't seem to find it in the outlook rule settings.

Does anyone know of a useful workaround?

Thanks!

 

I don't really use facebook anymore so couldn't care less; but so happened to log in today to change my password and saw this on my front page.

view more: ‹ prev next ›