[-] ub0x5jtk 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, not ideal, but better than mere website.

Even better option would be a dedicated password manager with MFA like Proton Pass etc. but banks use their authentications in various ways and are regulated more.

[-] ub0x5jtk 1 points 1 day ago

You realize the mobile gaming market is mostly micro transactions and it has nothing to do with Google? The same happened to the PC gaming over the last ten years. You can blame customers for their human nature of feeling good for beating their in-game enemies with money to compensate for their psychological deficiencies.

[-] ub0x5jtk 1 points 1 day ago

The ruling was Absurd.

  • Make an open system
  • Add optional license to provide a dozen of your apps as a price for your infrastructure for the app marketplace (security scans, performance optimizations based on runtime, networking, marketing etc)
  • your platform has a lot of competition, Google is the worst search engine these day, iPhone is dropping price sharply to aggressively grab new customers, China decouples, and you allow all competition to provide their own stores since day one.
  • get sued and lose in a case where you need to provide 100% of your app library to Epic which is doing much worse practices, and their only motive is higher profit margin with zero interest in any improvement, in fact everything can only get worse - fragmented, low quality of EGS, no innovation just see how Amazon Appstore stiffles APK format.

Google is by no means perfect, or even good, but this ruling is outright bullshit, I'd go as far as saying Trump wouldn't be as dumb as these judges, and that means a lot.

I don't want to say they are influenced by Chinese money, because I don't have the evidence. Though Epic being Chinese and the ruling benefiting Chinese companies make me alert.

[-] ub0x5jtk 2 points 1 day ago

You are mentioning a domino effect, but the main goal is beneficial in itself, increasing security. I hope people posting here are not using Windows XP in 2024, or have not updated their Linux packages since 2017.

Go search for how long companies take to patch a vulnerability. It is like 60 days for critical CVEs on average, 300 days overall.

[-] ub0x5jtk 1 points 1 day ago

It is a good design, especially security wise. Many banks require 2FA from their app/companion app.

[-] ub0x5jtk 2 points 1 day ago

Fake news, Android is fully open source. You are talking about Google/vendor stack on top of it,

It is as if you started blaming a copy left car engine schematics provider that their engine is being used in a commercial car.

[-] ub0x5jtk 0 points 1 day ago

Google is by no means a monopoly. There is iOS, few other systems, and even on android you have a dozen of stores.

And the pre-installed Google apps package deal is completely fine. You get a system you would have to spend billions on, infrastructure, verified brand, and much more, and you get their product for the price of bundling it with few more, which end user can just not use or even debloat.

You must really hate Google to think this is in an way unfair.

[-] ub0x5jtk 1 points 1 day ago

Good, no need to pay for overpriced Snapdragon. It would make sense to stick to Snapdragon only to outcompete China, but Mediatek is a Taiwanese ally instead.

[-] ub0x5jtk 2 points 1 year ago

Of course they do, you can file a request so they would send you what info they hold. I did so. They store everything - your every message, all login dates, device metadata and anything else you can think of.

The best part? They say that the messages you send are like email, so they are not obliged to delete them.

[-] ub0x5jtk 3 points 1 year ago

On xiaomi blog they mentioned it will not get MIUI 15.

[-] ub0x5jtk 21 points 1 year ago

I've got zero expectations, they made POCO F3 and F4 with same SoC but F3 is EOL, and F4 still gets updates.

Considering they neglected it in ideal conditions, how can we believe them to support less convergent set of devices?

Anyway, anyone can tell me why should we care about Android updates except for security? I'm totally bored by Android 14, not even one interesting thing in release notes. Maybe taking sharing menu out of OEM hands and updating it through Play Store, but seeing how they did something like that in Chrome makes it rather intrusive feature.

MIUI is even more boring, from MIUI 11 to 14 on POCO F3 I have noticed no changes in the skin, they added widgets for China-only but these see useful, just nice to look at. I love widgets, but c'mon.

42
submitted 1 year ago by ub0x5jtk to c/android

OEM ROM:

  • just works / ootbe
  • proprietary features
  • project mainline: security updates and some system components updated independently of OEM after EOL
  • safety net / play integrity
  • look & feel is on a higher level than an average custom ROM
  • years after EOL, majority of apps will still support the ROM, kitkat is loosing support from play services this year, majority of apps target lolipop.

Custom ROM:

  • fun with tinkering
  • risks, worries, time spent
  • more updates
  • hit & miss -> either better or worse battery life, these are often targeting middle-school boys fanatic about anime, overclocking destroys heat management and battery life, safety net can stop working any day
  • sketchy hacks to get some services for free etc.
  • nice hacks to get 80% battery charging limit, underclock, automate tasks
  • huge fragmentation and duplication of effort that leads nowhere among tons of ROMS, competition among them does not do any good currently as they have no incentive to compete
  • unlocked bootloader -> less security when it's confiscated; but some people are able to lock the bootloader on a custom ROM.
  • on one hand increased privacy, but not many people audit custom ROMS, so they pose higher security and privacy risks.

I just scratched the surface, but I think custom ROMS have failed people like me who value having no worries about safety net limiting their contactless payments, cards for public transportation within apps, those who value battery life and love underclocks, professional look instead of kitsch, peace of mind, features out of the box like dolby atmos, additional features from the OEM like gesture screenshots, scrolling screenshots and a lot other features.

Let me know if I'm wrong in the comments.

7
submitted 1 year ago by ub0x5jtk to c/xiaomi

Was it possible to flash a global ROM onto Chinese version of any Mi Band? Would you guess it would happen with Mi Band 8 Pro?

It would solve two problems:

  • Chinese variant often costs half the price
  • No need to wait months to get your hands on the device
view more: next ›

ub0x5jtk

joined 1 year ago