tuxrandom

joined 2 years ago
[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

It's probably some kind of weird reward effect in our brains. Like "Yay, whatever I just ate attacked me and I survived! Gimme some more of that!"

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Essentially the EU does.

I'm not sure the rest of the world knows about the plans to make backdoors in encrypted communication mandatory, i. e. outlawing any form of effective encryption. They say it's against crime but I strongly believe it is mainly about total surveillance, maybe a little bit for censorship.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So we're gonna have to start using Tor against censorship in the so-called 'civilised' world as well.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Linux compatibility is highest

The L14 Gen1 I have must be an exception then. The fingerprint reader isn't compatible at all (I feel kinda taken for a ride there since it's seemingly the only Synaptics reader without Linux compatibility) and both Bluetooth and USB are very buggy. I haven't used it with Windows, so the latter two may also be down to crappy firmware. Either way I'm rather disappointed for the price tag and probably not buying Lenovo again any time soon.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sponsorblock theoretically exists

In its current form, it would only work if each video had the ads injected at the same timestamp and with the same duration everytime, which I find unlikely.

It would have to implement some dynamic behavior. It is however in at least some countries required to visibly and clearly mark ads, so a check for that marking could possibly be implemented. But that's more of a thing I'd expect uBO to do instead of Sponsorblock.

Going by recent internet history, every anti-adblock measure will have its according anti-anti-adblock measure within at most a few weeks by now. That's the beauty of community-driven open source projects.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Serious question: Why do you use Chrome, a browser made by the world's largest advertising and spying company, when you give the slightest f* about privacy?

At least use Ungoogled Chromium if you're not gonna switch to something actually privacy-focused. Basically the same functionality, but without Google's spyware.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 28 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's one of the reasons my next phone will be Android (with a non-spying custom ROM) instead of an iPhone. Although KDE Connect is already surprisingly powerful on the latter given the limitations of the platform.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I've gone to use the internet basically only on real computers and throwing a whole arsenal of annoyance and tracking blocking measures at it. The 'vanilla' internet experience has just become utterly unusable. If I use it on mobile, I do so in Brave as it is the only iOS browser that lets you use uBO filter lists and is able to fool websites into thinking you're on desktop.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

To be fair, he may actually be a democrat, just a historic one. Their 'roles' were kind of reversed compared to today until somewhere in the last century if my outside knowledge of US political history serves right.

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 47 points 2 years ago

Did you know that X Corp. has a website for their hamster business as well?

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

So I guess it's only a matter of time until Facebook renames itself to ๐•.
(It's the same offset in the alphabet)

[โ€“] tuxrandom@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

The only downside is that even the most basic configurations are well over my price range. For anything small enough to be considered portable by me, they're even at least double my laptop budget. But I guess quality comes at it's (seemingly exponential) price.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ