And manipulate the firmware obviously.
trompete
This is just my unqualified opinion, but from a practical standpoint of both pulling it off and not looking obvious, it would be whole lot easier to use the existing radio and hardware, together with manipulated firmware to explode these things. You'd have to put a whole second set of electronics in there otherwise, which would possibly look sus. I don't know also why Israel would care if some of them didn't go off when they are not in use.
Then about the explosives. If you wanted to hide the explosives, you might package them with the battery. That way, from the outside, it just looks like a chunky battery, and people are unlikely to open up the battery because it's dangerous. It would be interesting to have a look at a battery from this type of pager. Batteries in laptops and phones actually already have electronics in the battery package, with digital data pins so you can talk to the battery and ask it about its state and whatnot. You could therefore produce a battery w/ explosives including a detonator which looked like a normal battery, and it could be triggered over the regular battery connector. You wouldn't see anything, not even extra wires, unless you opened up the battery itself.
Tower just broadcasts all the messages, and every beeper receives them all, then filters out the ones that are for a different number. The tower does not know if you got the message.
Motorola is originally a US Company and was bought by Lenovo. Lenovo is bit of a special case for a Chinese company, it's very international since they bought IBMs PC business. Lots of offices and employees outside of China.
I'm a bit worried they're going to strike hospitals to finish off the injured.
Pagers can receive messages without producing radio signals themselves, so are impossible to locate.
Well in theory anyway, pagers that can also send do exist.
Ukraine is now losing ground in five different sections of the front line simultaneously. In Kursk, near Kupiansk, around Chasiv Yar, near Pokrovsk and near Vuhledar.
Can't remember any source that wasn't just speculating about this. I don't think there's any evidence you could cite at him.
My own theory: If you were to blow up the dam for defensive purposes, you'd want to blow it up after the enemy had already crossed in significant numbers, but the only thing going on there in the weeks before was the occasional Ukrainian recon unit maybe doing prep work.
If, on the other hand, you were planning an offensive across the river, it might be smart to preempt this by blowing up the dam before you attempt to cross. Now, it would of course be total stupidity to do an offensive across the mouth of the Dnieper, even after the dam is blown. Nevertheless, the Ukrainians sent elite units to conquer and hold a bridgehead there after the flooding had subsided, and only gave up a couple of weeks ago.
The thing was also blown up two days before the start of the greatest Ukrainian ~~spring~~ summer counteroffensive. Coincidence?
I have actually chilled out a bit on this. Russia is winning and this escalation isn't significant enough to change that. Russia isn't desperate at the moment, and therefore the cooler heads should easily have the upper hand against any nuke-crazy maniacs.
It's still an escalation obviously, so unless someone gives in at some point, we're all going to die. It's just that right now, I don't think the Russians have any reason to even consider going nuclear.
Figure out first if this is a dwm problem. Does it work in openbox (or whatever)? What does xrandr say?
There's some bs story spreading among maga Karens about Haitain immigrants stealing people's pets to eat them.
I mean let's assume the shipment was specifically to Hezbollah, then Hezbollah presumably would be handing these out only to their own members and people they need to be in contact with, like that Iranian ambassador.