Assuming detectives count, Criminal Record? I don't know, I just looked it up, I don't actually have Apple stuff. I'd be really surprised if there wasn't more on it, even if it's not original programming.
Edit: Slow Horses too perhaps? Although it's more domestic intelligence shit, it's in the same vein.
There's copaganda everywhere. Cop shows are like the cosmic background radiation of TV. Cheap, trope heavy, the plots and characters basically write themselves.
Thanks for the rec!
Upvote for Jesse Welles. I appreciate his music can be topical, but also humorous and chill. Maybe not the sort of protest songs you play to fire people up, but definitely ones that will get their message stuck in your head.
The DNC made clear today that all Democrats, including millions who are AIPAC members, have the right to participate fully in the Democratic process, and we plan to do just that," AIPAC spokesperson Deryn Sousa told ABC News.
All those AIPAC members can fuck off, their money is going toward perpetuating war and genocide.
Citizens United, and PACs in general, have done nothing but make this country's politics more and more toxic and here the DNC couldn't even pass a symbolic resolution against one of the worst of them.
Yeah, couldn't care less if Chrome is faster when it is controlled by Google and actively working against extensions.
Not to mention we crossed a performance line maybe 10 years ago where browser engines on modern processors are basically trivial. Once we started having 8+ threads and the browsers got smart enough to leverage them, I'd bet bandwidth (or memory if you have many tabs), is a way more typical bottleneck.
I wish they wouldn't call this a reboot, it's almost the entire OG cast, for one, and IIRC these four episodes are all they're doing. This review criticises it for feeling like a reunion special but that's what it is.
I'll watch the episodes, but I think it's silly to expect anything more than a nostalgia bomb.
I read the post, but as I mentioned elsewhere, how are devs (or malicious commercial thieves looking for public domain code) supposed to detect this code is an LLM creation when all of the obvious signs they mention are stripped?
A ban on people using an LLM in secret is unenforceable and the code output can be indistinguishable from a human's, especially when a real human that understands the change is there to baby it and write commit messages etc.
Fuck you, Ellison and Paramount. I'd rather watch the franchise die than turn into fanfic for fascists anyway.
How are the devs or anyone else supposed to tell that though, if all the LLM trappings are absent?
That seems pretty good to me? I hate LLMs, but this policy is basically "if it's obviously LLM garbage or you don't understand it, it will be rejected" and I'm not sure it's practical to do better.
People will use LLMs behind the scenes, but if they are able to write a coherent justification with clear understanding of the code, receive feedback from devs and rework it, as well as submitting code that is well structured etc. it's not really any different than any other PR.
I've worked on unionizing businesses with multiple locations and the big issue is communication. Locations rarely have overlapping staff below the management level and chatting with coworkers, having rapport with them is key to building faith in any sort of collective action.
That said, Starbucks Workers United (mentioned in the article briefly) may be able to pull something off with a more regional scope, but AFAIK they focus on shops that are already working on unionizing rather than cold calling locations.