[-] teuast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

very little if any of what i said was subjective, and everything i said that was controversial has decades of data behind it. i don't think you know what "subjective" means. maybe you would if you'd paid attention in public school

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

neither he nor anybody else here has called you a nazi, but if you're so used to being called a nazi that you just assume anything you say is going to get you labeled as one, maybe you should have a think about why. if you met an asshole today, you met an asshole, but if you meet assholes all day every day, either you're a proctologist or you're the asshole.

anyway, to your point, the reason parents don't get to decide how public school educates their kids is because kids need to learn about evolution in order to understand any of biology, they need to learn about american slavery in order to understand anything about why this country is the way it is, they need to learn about objectivity vs. subjectivity and how statistics work in order to detect when they're being lied to, by, say, fox news, and they need to learn about how their own bodies work so that they don't get and spread stds, don't have unwanted pregnancies and drop out of college, don't think they're freaks if their gender or sexuality doesn't fit neatly into one of the standard boxes, and do know what sexual abuse is and what to do if it happens to them. and parents claiming parents' rights on education are always and only ever doing it because they want their kids to be ignorant on all of those subjects, with all the negative consequences that follow from that. and that was also something the nazis wanted, hence why they burned down and destroyed the work of the institute for sexual research, as well as a bunch of other stuff.

so yeah, i'm not going to call you a nazi, but i am going to say that the things you argue for align pretty closely with things the nazis argued for.

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

this is the funniest thing i have seen today

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

You raise a good point, but are they still boycotting Nike, Gillette, or Keurig?

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Pandering came out in 2016, apparently, so that's more like seven years. But also, we all know they're going to forget about being mad at Bud Light, move on to the next stupid culture war BS and start buying their Bud Light again within the year.

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

i wish he was half as cool as they make him sound

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

i don't see a problem with that

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

we'll see who cancels who

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Arguably, the biggest part of it.

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

even when the tweet that this screenshot came from is included and shows that it was posted by a woman

[-] teuast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I bet if we stole the idea of reddit gold and allowed people to award comments and posts, but 1. no premium membership and 2. make it clear that the money is going to help keep the service running, that would bring in a lot of revenue without harming the community.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

teuast

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF