- metacognitive myopia explained why people didn't/couldn't update their beliefs about the existence of "weapons of mass destruction etc".
- dogwhistling the threat of sexual revolution "comrade kamala" (i.e., he's implying hypocrisy when he doesn't understand what lenin's use of the term "prostitute" meant).
- playing the fool until you can't (i.e., making his base feel insightful and "seen" as playfully serious, homophilically/mimetically charismatic; e.g., his base feels like their inference-making is being promoted based on linguistic sympathy through the aura of charisma).
- from (3) somewhere in his administration they're letting the would-be "fool" base do the grunt-work and creating cover; see "Optimal Team Formation Under Asymmetric Information".
tetranomos
joined 2 years ago
elizabeth warren lampoons trump and vance
seems more important that people wanted him to, even if he didn't, as what a settlement might imply.
is the threat better than the existence of the threat? does threatening mean being constantly present?
have books become too heavy for men?
South Park's comedic antics will be lost on droves of beautiful souls unless The Critic is rebooted.
algorithms of oppression. noble.
but it allows for some people to type out one-liners and generate massive blobs of text at the same time that they could be doing their jobs. /codecraft