terrific

Using phrasing such as "necessarily implies" is exactly what makes me call your conversation style "lecturing".

Is it normal to talk like this in your circles? In my culture it's a certain way to antagonize anyone who doesn't already agree with you.

It's a fair point. Your assessment is missing one crucial piece of context: my last conversation with CowBee. It was really quite painful and I'm just not in the mood for another treatment.

I'm sorry if I'm dismissive but I gotta tell you, last time we talked felt an awful lot like being lectured. You didn't really engage with anything I said but rather regurgitated endless theories and facts.

And you are a self-proclaimed Marxist-Leninist, is that not true? Subscribing to a particular narrative is IMO exactly what "dogmatic" means. I'm not saying it's wrong, it's truer than most dogmas. But still a dogma.

Americans think that the US is the centre of the universe 🙄

One can hope. The UK is a few revolutions behind.

I would much rather send my children off to a school run by the CCP than one run by the bastard elite that has been sucking the UK dry for centuries. They are run with a Machiavellian philosophy that generates ruthless, lonely psychopaths.

I also absolutely hate everything Thatcher did, but I think most British private schools were private long before she selling off Britain's assets.

Britain has been an oligarchy/kleptocracy for centuries. And like all such systems it's vulnerable to takeover from very big fish.

So Palantir sells a data management tool and deployment support. That shouldn't really surprise anyone who knows the first thing about data science.

The interesting thing about Palantir isn't what they sell but how they sell it and who buys it. They clearly market their unremarkable software as an autocrat's wet dream.

And police and military departments across Europe and the US buy their shit, which says more about those police and military departments than about the software.

Good old Gary setting the record straight...

No hypothesis has ever been given more benefit of the doubt, nor more funding. After half a trillion dollars in that direction, it is obviously time to move on. The disappointing performance of GPT-5 should make that enormously clear.

Unlikely, but I like his optimism. This is how I have felt with the release of every new LLM for the two years, but the scam is somehow still going 🤷 .. I suppose many people stand to lose a lot of money when the bubble finally bursts.

I agree but that's a somewhat different discussion IMO.

Even if Palantir's software was just a simple interface for a database, the fact that it's proprietary means that there could be secret backdoors for the US Intelligence community to look at the data. There almost certainly are. That makes it an issue of national security on top of one of personal liberty.

There. Fixed it for you.