I think you're missing the point. Stallman meant that it would be absurd to classify something as rape just for their age, the most important thing is of course context. Moreover, all of this argument about someone needing to reach the complete state of neurological development in order to have sex is flawed since men don't develop to their full extent until their 30s. You can absolutely make a choice for yourself even before that age and therefore before reaching that point of brain development. If it wasn't like that, we also wouldn't allow people to vote, get guns, work etc. The age of consent exists in order not to criminalize sex between teenagers and also allow to shades and case to case evaluation. Of course it is not perfect, but it is the best tool we have
super_user_do
joined 3 years ago
Nice ad hominem fallacy bro
La maggior parte della mia generazione non ha mai usato un computer, o comunque non ne ha uno o non l'ha mai usato di propria spontanea volontà. Ho visto ragazzi che oggi hanno 18/20 anni non riuscire a distinguere lo schermo dal corpo macchina.
Vi auguro il meglio!
"illecito"
Time will tell, but thats what usually happens
No shit bro for real?
Remember that your 2nd amendment exists to make the people able to overthrow their government and not only to shoot gay people
Golden Wind? Stardust crusaders?
The only good Monopoly is state driven. Everything else is bullshit
view more: next ›

You got the point blud