solrize

joined 2 years ago
[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

What do you mean by untraceable? If I remember you got some kind of file but it didn't work, right?

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Given today's events I'd like the two million kind, please.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2BlUN-h8-I

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
  1. No it likely wouldn't make them explode if they hypothetically were there.

  2. It's reasonably certain that Iran didn't and doesn't have any usable nukes at the moment. The claim is that they were working on building them and that the bombing was to stop them from completing any such projects.

  3. There are conflicting opinions about whether they were really working on building nukes. One might reasonably also say that if they weren't working on it before, they are NOW.

  4. IIRC there was some kind of religious fatwa against Iran building nukes, which made the claim somewhat credible that they weren't building them. It looked to me like they were instead getting the precursor materials together without doing the final refining and assembly, so that if the fatwa was lifted and the clerics said build the nukes, they could do so relatively quickly. That's just me though, and I don't have any special sources of info.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Are you saying you are able to download a pdf but it is somehow malformed? Did you try converting it to ps (PostScript) and were you able to get anything at all?

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Not sure what to suggest, maybe try on a different phone? I'm unable to view the play store page that you linked.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe they can dogfight some Nazgûl on horses.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"How to speak to a vaccine sceptic: research reveals what works Hesitancy about vaccinations is on the rise, but studies show there are specific ways to address people's questions."

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01771-z

Optimistic, but a start maybe.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

Kinda ridiculous, don't want. At least it doesn't have those silly multi colored lights on the sides though.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 26 points 2 weeks ago

Lol, how many times have they done this now? They are obsessed.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sometimes they are on a remote server that I sshfs mount and play the same way. Multiple people could use the server at the same time if desired, though for me it hasn't been an issue. It's audio, I don't need a visual UI for it. I still have a fair amount of physical media too including LP's, though my record player is long gone.

Anyway, be happy that I didn't mention FORTH :).

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I just don't get it, I've seen people struggle with itunes, that stuff is way too complicated and I don't see any need for it. Maybe I'm missing something but if I want to play some music and it's in a file, saying "play this file" seems about as direct as it gets.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

https://biggaybunny.tumblr.com/post/166787080920/tech-enthusiasts-everything-in-my-house-is-wired

I just have a bunch of media files (.ogg, .mp3, etc.) in directories and play them with mplayer from the command line. Playlist = shell script that plays some group of files. I use old school track numbering (01-whatever, 02-whatsit, etc.) though, so most of the time "mplayer *" is how I play an album and the tracks play automatically in the right order. I don't understand the purpose of anything fancier. Now get off my lawn.

view more: ‹ prev next ›