setsneedtofeed

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There is FTL, which is accomplished by creating a field around the ship and jumping point to point. It's not unlimited, as there are certain points that can only be accessed from certain other points. Not to get too down that path but it's very ley line and new age crystal kind of logic there.

However, the colony ships themselves arent independently capable of FTL. They are slaved to an FTL capable tug ship and transported to their destination. This is done on a contract. Colony ships are built to order, almost always as part of a larger colony contract that includes initial survey, customized colony ship modifications, transport to the planet, landing the colony ship, and setting it up.

There are living quarters, however those are mainly meant to be used once the ship is landed. The ship is skeleton crewed by contractors (usually from the same company supplying the FTL tug ship) during transit. The contractors specialize in these jobs so they land the colony ship. The actual colonists, along with more contractors, are passengers on the tug ship. They come down to the surface after the colony ship has landed. There is an initial period where the contractors help with initial colony set up, such as detaching the colony ship main engines, adjusting how the ship sits on the ground, securing anchoring, and other tasks. The colonists while usually containing some flight certified members and mechanical engineers are not subject experts on landing colonies or setting them up.

 

Sketch idea for a small colony ship. The idea is the ship enters the atmosphere, discards its detachable heat shield (which lands a reasonable distance away with a controlled parachute fall, so its material can be recovered later). The ship lands and the ring on it becomes a premade perimeter wall. The variable arms holding the rest of the ship adjust and lower until the bottom of the center is on the ground. Heavy cargo and prefabs get moved out. On top, the large space engines detach and are briefly piloted as independent vehicles, and landed next to the colony to be repurposed. The flight pad on top of the structure is extended and supported with an additional strut. This initial colony is a little cramped, but a good foundation that is built to be secure, able to support air traffic, and able to support basic agriculture. I'm picturing it being several families worth of people.


Just something that came to me last night while trying to think up unique ships and tech.

 
 
 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

This is the best comment any drawing I've ever done has gotten.

 
 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I have a wishlist of Fallout remake/remaster ideas, but sadly I don't think any of them would ever be implimented.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Yippie kay yay, ~~Butthole~~ Mr. Falcon.

 
 
73
Living the dream (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world to c/artshare@lemmy.world
 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Some bombs, like the BLU-107 do exactly that.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Open your folder of shitposts and ...ugh... check for millipedes.

 
 
[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

The practice became the standard for nomenclature starting in the 1920s, gradually replacing other conventions such as naming based on the year of adoption (M1911, M1919, and M1903 as examples). This led to a lot of M1s in WW2 due to the timing of the nomenclature change.

I find it interesting that the .30-06 caliber is named for year of adoption, with the name of the standard cartridge in WW2 being M1.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You still have to go through the ATF permitting process, this just strips out the arbitrary cost that was stuck in the original NFA.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Very neat. I've been on the fence about a suppressor for a PCC so this tips it.

[–] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If three people all have different terminal medical conditions, which are currently making their state of life excruciating, and will kill them shortly, and there is one healthy person who can be killed and their organs repurposed to restore quality of life and stop the medical condition to all of those people then utilitarianism says it is moral to do that.

Any answer saying that it is wrong to do that shows there must be a factor beyond need in the determination.

view more: next ›