Can't wait to hear it.
What do you think are the most important things to have as auxiliary systems on battle draft?
Battle Dress in the Imperium is complex and generally misunderstood. If you were designing Battle Dress and it didn't currently exist in the Third Imperium what capabilities would it have? Would there be integral weapons? Electronic Warfare? Would the exoskeleton add strength or just endurance? Inquiring minds want to know.
If you’re not interested in the product, that’s one thing but this isn’t something that they’re printing 5 million copies of. This is a prestige format book on a niche in industry. I personally paid upwards of $150 for a single history text, so I don’t know what you’re talking about. Not all books are the same.
Definitely NOT outrageous. $20 in 1982 is equivalent to $66 now. SOURCE. (The purchasing power of the US dollar is a third of what it was in 1982.) I have a copy of the book on my desk and it is incredibly well researched and printd and bound on good quality paper with excellent art in four colors. Look at Shannon's other work on RPG history and you will see some fantastic work.
VTM illustrates all of the pros and cons of the Storyteller milieu. It is still the game that people talk about, even more than WoD.
Shannon's work on game history is stellar. I ordered it immediately upon publication and it sits proudly on my coffee table.
I'd definitely study the evolution of the hobby using books like The Elusive Shift (Petersen), Role-Playing Game Studies: Transmedia Foundations (Deterding, Zagal) and Designers & Dragons: A History of the Roleplaying Game Industry (Appelcline). Once the students had a grounding in the history I would suggest a unit on Dice and Probability, the Mechanics and influence on settings.
- D&D for level and progression, and contrasting that against Palladium's approach.
- Traveller for the lifepath concept as well as the developing of universal setting.
- Hero System and the rise of point based mechanics, contrasting with GURPS.
- Interlock (Mekton, Cyberpunk) and the emergence of Unified Game Mechanics, maybe contrast with Atlas Games All Flesh Must Be Eaten, et al.
- Vampire, and the development of Dice Pools and the rise of “splats” as a business model.
- Over The Edge and Amber Diceless as differing approaches to non-traditional RPGs.
- Sorcerer, indie games, The Forge, and the story game movement. See also gamist/narrativist/simulationist as styles of play.
- D&D 3.0 and the OGL explosion.
- Apocalypse World and the New Wave of RPGs as a reaction to OGL. (one man's opinion).
Sorry, yes, terms are considered ten years IMTU.
Yes, 2013, 2020, and RED are. I am not certain about 3e as I wasn't a contributor.
Just curious, as a former 2020 freelancer I occasionally check in.
Why just RED? Why not a wider group?
view more: next ›
Well, to start out with, Traveler was the second game I ever played in 1977, just a few weeks after I started playing Dungeons & Dragons. I think the pulpy goodness and the references to the Age of Sail give a really great roleplaying environment. Traveller really created the concept of the big story arc within the game, and the lifepath system. Both really give you a lot of information that you can use to create a fun character. Combat is pretty deadly and I think that helps encourage role-playing. There are some anachronisms and things that don't really make sense in a modern context. However, I think you can really leave those if the rest of this setting makes sense to you.