nickhammes

Asking whether the project uses AI responsibly means you either need to define responsibly in a way that people can apply objectively, noting that everyone will have opinions about whether it's a good definition. Or you leave it undefined and the answer basically means nothing.

Instead he became a modern George Lincoln Rockwell.

It turns out, when you kick people out of a community for being toxic, racist, or otherwise counterproductive to maintaining a community... they go form a right wing spinoff of that community. I feel like it says a lot that when you kick people out for traits that aren't "being right wing", they form communities around that shared identity.

If travel dropped by an order of magnitude, and 3.9 million Canadians traveled to the USA, that's 200 people in 3,900,000, a bit less than 1 in 19,000. On a national scale that's obviously a concerning number, but on an individual scale, I'm not sure personal exposure to that risk will change all that many people's decisions. Those who it does change likely perceive themselves at higher risk than the average Canadian.

That's assuming it's a good estimate, but I suspect from numbers I've seen on flight traffic drops, this is an overestimate; likely more Canadians traveled to the USA, and so the individual risk is even lower.

The chief Justice presides over the Senate trial, so the supreme court isn't uninvolved, but it's basically up to the Senate.

You don't want your editor screaming fast like /bin/ed on an RTX 5090?

Thanks to government subsidies it's much easier to boot into the corn kernel within the United States. But if you enable your VPN within your BIOdieSel, you can still take advantage of them abroad

5. Windows as a whole is less useful than prior versions in significant ways. They presumably know this, but think they can make it better in the long run than it was before, without AI. But given that a lot of what they've done is tear out well-suited technologies for the problems people face on desktop OSes, and replace them with LLMs that aren't as well-suited to the task, I'm not sure how they can justify that to themselves. I can't imagine the justification is particularly good.

"Show me where on touch-me Elmo Elmo touched you"

Yes, but if Rudy Giuliani's disbarment is evidence of anything, brazenly defrauding the legal system for political purposes can have that effect. Much like Comey's claim being one that rarely succeeds, I think we're in the realm of possibility where rare things may well happen

Salmonella recall? Nah, I've got a kitchen autoclave, I'll be fine

If the goal is to serve people with larger distances to groceries today, and unmet needs, it's probably not as helpful in wealthier areas like Staten Island. Though surely some people there will benefit.

I can't find easy data on grocery store density, but I'm guessing if the program is as successful as it seems like it should be, dozens of stores across NYC seems like a place they could get quickly. Probably not evenly distributed across boroughs though.