nickhammes

I mean, it's in western Asia, next to Azerbaijan and Georgia. "Complicated definitions of Europe" are part of the point here, but it's pretty clearly not Europe in my mind, but given the Turkish border, it's not far from Europe like Australia is

Australia, Armenia, and Morocco are all outside of Europe, and have completed too. Basically all European countries are eligible, plus those whose public broadcasters are part of the European Broadcasting Union.

Why not both?

at least ransomware is upfront about its intentions?

A

Basically since the Wikia rebrand to fandom, they've been owned by venture capital vultures, and have unsurprisingly dropped off. Stupid little nonsense like this doesn't surprise me

This is one of many examples of a class of problem where the technology is the easy part. There's room to improve the tech certainly, but the technology sufficient to solve the problem is already well understood.

The hard part is how to get people to actually do the necessary changes. To consume less, get fewer gas cars on the road, increase the amount of nuclear, hydro, solar, geothermal, and wind in the grid, and minimize coal and gas use. To reduce land use by cows, and increase land use by trees and native plants.

But maybe AI is the secret here. We have tools that are in the hype moment whose training data already contains several reasonable solutions to climate change. Maybe if AI "finds" the solution to climate change, people will finally listen

Every time I see something this funny on LinkedIn, I remember that it would be an insult to the creative genius of the satirist who wrote it not to laugh react it. Have I laugh reacted something meant seriously? Probably, but it's for the greater good.

When I was looking for a job last year, I made a point to be honest. I was definitely trying to present an appealing version of myself, but I didn't want to land a job to learn a few weeks in that they had toxic management cultures, insane work expectations or other giant red flags. Maybe if I examined everything I said something was untrue, but I certainly tried to be honest.

I interviewed over 30 places, some of them almost certainly rejected me because I was honest about being a poor fit for a toxic environment. But that's fantastic, I wanted them to reject me if they were like that. I'm super happy with where I landed.

Lots of people lie, and there's certainly an expectation to lie and commodify yourself. Some people even believe the lies they tell themselves. But I think being more honest about your basic expectations and minimum requirements is a better strategy. Be yourself, and not the commodity they want you to be, but also make sure they understand why your unique skills are helpful to them. It's a fine line, but I think threading it works well, and if everybody tried to, we'd have a bit better world.

What's really wild is that not only are games good enough on Windows, but tests lately are showing a consistent trend where the two are often indistinguishable in performance, and where they're not, Windows isn't consistently winning.

If you're not into the genre of competitive multiplayer games that have kernel anticheat, Windows isn't really better for gaming anymore, outside of being more familiar for many people. Today we've reached the point where it's a few fps either way, and people should use whatever they want, but if Microsoft keeps bloating Windows, it might soon be that the "Windows tax" also refers to the performance penalty you pay for using the familiar OS instead of learning something new.

Privacy is a spectrum, there are ways to improve or worsen it on basically every website. The implementation of a system like this matters a lot; requiring the sites to collect and store IDs like they've been doing in the UK dramatically worsens user privacy with no upside.

Invading the privacy of every adult who uses YouTube is a.. good idea?