nickhammes

If he keeps filing, is there a point where the court starts to discipline his attorney for wasting court time?

Like I assume practically speaking subsequent filings would make clerks waste their time, and probably at least speak to a justice given the sitting POTUS is involved. But at some point it seems like the lawyer submitting any subsequent appeal is just asking for a SCOTUS justice to write the bar association a negative recommendation about their conduct.

Don't let LLMs take your em dashes; flattening your language to the lowest common denominator to avoid doing anything too distinctive less you be accused of non-authorship.. that's a real harm to you and your reader. If you know how to use them, and enjoy using them, use them fearlessly.

Props for responding constructively.

The false positive rate is pretty low, but a false negative of 35% is pretty concerning in terms of whether they're fit for purpose. Like it'll rarely misclassify human writing as AI generated, but it's somewhat closer to a coin flip in correctly identifying AI generated language. It's a signal, but I imagine it's a poor substitute for the judgement of a person who has spent time teaching teenagers / young adults to write.

Which to the original point isn't totally snake oil, but it's maybe not a great tool for the professionals who it's targeting.

Doesn't the 12th amendment prevent that? Because having served two terms makes Trump constitutionally ineligible for the office of President after his term ends, the 12th should make him consequently ineligible for the office of the vice presidency.

Now getting him into the line of succession, and having a few people above him resign, it's convoluted, but probably isn't expressly illegal.

The writing is.. worse than I'd thought when I played it as a 13 year old, but the gameplay is from the early era of good 3D Sonic, and the stage layout making a playthrough short means the weaker parts of the design don't need to overstay their welcome too much. As someone who loved 3D Sonic games growing up, and never got into the 2D ones, I don't totally disagree.

If you really want a controversial take: Sonic 06 was a good game with redeeming qualities.

The Iranians have the right goal of refusing to negotiate until Trump leaves office, deals signed with him have almost never been worth the paper they were written on.

Everything is political. Especially things that claim not to be.

Minnesotans at 30°F are a great example of direction mattering, and not just temperature; hit 30 on the way down and you'll see them change out of shorts, but hit 30 on the way up and you'll see them change into shorts

Even if it's nowhere near a majority of the power, I'm surprised passive cooling from solar plus some electricity isn't worthwhile enough to be universal. It's a small impact, but also cheap enough it'll pay for itself, and many orders of magnitude more efficient than trying to get a datacenter into space, and figure out how to cool it

It depends.

If the threat is "we're about to have a fight you won't survive", your critique is valid. If the threat is "you've just been poisoned, and will succumb within a few days", then giving them the time to put their papers in order really won't harm the speaker at all. Though maybe it isn't entirely effective as a threat. If the threat is "I can take actions that will end your life, but all I'm telling you is it's happening soon" it works as an ominous threat, and a sincere offer (though they'd probably better hurry).

Honestly if we brought back the ransom note aesthetic, people might find it a breath of fresh air compared to the low effort chat gpt posters they see today.

A judge can draw conclusions of adverse inference, but the fifth amendment limits that rule in criminal matters. I think evidence tampering is the more relevant concern here, but also ianal.