No.

Even if the EU could, how would this be strategic in the long term?

Huge energy losses in the conversion of electricity to hydrogen. Also for passenger cars there are no clear benefits. 350kW chargers provide hundreds of kilometers of range in under 20 minutes.

In addition to what was mentioned already, read Door to Door, and use this famous constant (by an Italian!) as a counter argument if the function of the road/project is to solve traffic.

If you really want to feel out: Braess's Paradox.

Provide out-of-box ease of use on everyday devices operated by low-skilled users.

I mean, Linux technically could, but the incentive to push for this is not nearly as high as the commercial incentives of providing this experience using Windows. So unfortunately it currently can't.

Hard to answer. I guess there is none.

A more nuanced take: https://kyivindependent.com/zelensky-war-has-entered-new-phase/

Let's not forget Putler failed to meet his objectives since week 1 of the war.

Most Japanese people have dry earwax: http://drypharmacist.com/types-of-earwax.html

Obviously this is cleaned differently compared to wet earwax.

Us j, k, l (-10s, play/pause, +10s). Does not require player focus.

Hint: The Rusten embassy to Finland is not Finnish.

The worst thing is how even 'European brands' like Volvo (in the article's introduction) and Smart are technically Chinese brands.

There's very little choice left already. And then there's the debate on whether you want to own a Musk-controlled alternative.

Take a dump, eat something, have a coffee, take another dump. Hangover gone.

Add water in between steps.