[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

the group has generated routes called Hamiltonian cycles

i only know this term which is simply a cycle going through all nodes, so Im going to assume there is a much easier way to explain what they achieved but the journalists are trying to be obtuse in order to sound smart.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago

Will this law ban goods made in the US via forced labor as well?

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

our anti-crime precautions
their high-tech surveillance

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 22 points 10 hours ago

If he relly believes democracy is at stake there is only one course of action left

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

I postulate that there comes a point where language is required to achieve a higher state of emotion.

Ah finally! A justification to eat my own child! Thank you kind stranger!

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

Look at all those people in that thread going "I dont know if animals have the same emotions or just similar ones" or "we can't prove that plants dont feel pain too!" and then splitting hairs in the most asinine pseudophilisophical debates, just so they dont have to engage with the core of the issue, that what they're doing is fucked up.

They know it, deep down, as did I before I went vegan, but it's eye-opening to see it "from the other side".

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Try something material. Something that has an effect in your material context.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

attack on identity

Another debate term. I'm not arguing with you. I don't care about the truth value of that statement since it's irrelevant to the point that I wanted to make. Please stop seeing every conversation through the lense of which fallacy can be applied. Not everything is a debate.

You'll see it's a much more freeing and fun way to interact with people, I promise.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

On second thought youre probably really young in which case I want to apologise. You're right that I neither argued for the claim in the link nor against your claim, I don't care about either of them since their irrelevant to the main point. Word of advice though, these kind of "fallacy debates" about irrelevant details are not productive I have never witnessed someone being swayed by it. Find something you actually care about then argue about that. Argue why you care for it, people are much more convinced by emotion than some stylized formal argument.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Just looked through your other comments, you're a debate pervert. You don't actually care about the topic at hand, you just want to debate.

[-] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

the latter lol it's just been bog-standard racism the past century. There's quite the movement to create inclusive childrens books though, to normalize different family structures and cultures right from the start, but animal books for vegans are still quite sparse.

edit: there's one book where spousal abuse is played for laughs a couple times though, by a very popular author too, extremely weird shit

1

All the ones I find are marginally better than just reading some randomly selected passage because any accompanying text us the most surface-level liberal interpration imaginable.

337
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by mathemachristian@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee

Not sure how to report entire communities, but https://lemm.ee/c/vaccines just opened up and it's a troll forum for vaccine misinformation.

view more: next ›

mathemachristian

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF