huppakee

joined 5 days ago
[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 8 points 19 hours ago

The brutality immediately gives away this is not the onion though, they never had headlines as harsh as the ones reality gives.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why not "have to be registered with the government"? That's still allow law abiding citizens to do whatever they want with their money.

Also, people saying digital money on your local bank is different than paper money of the central bank; both are merely a promise. Back in the day the promise was related to a value in gold, now either are relatively empty promises. All banks do is keep track of the numbers, a bank note is proof your unregistered number is valid.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Introductory paragraph:

Since 1994, Infomaniak has followed the same path: privacy, environmental responsibility, and local roots. Thirty-two years on, these commitments are no longer just promises. On 13 May 2026, our founder Boris Siegenthaler transferred the majority of Infomaniak’s voting rights to a Swiss public-interest foundation: the Infomaniak Foundation. An irrevocable move, rare in Europe, that places the company beyond the reach of any takeover and sets its DNA in stone. For you, our customers, this means one thing: your cloud will remain Swiss, independent, and true to its values. Forever.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 7 points 19 hours ago

I agree, but from time to time somebody puts a seemingly interesting article on lemmy and I do want to click. Since you're already putting effort in, my lazy ass would be totally helped if you could also add an alternative in your comment. Or just a generic link you edit when you copy paste your response, something like

[url of search engine]/keyword1 + keyword2 -politico.eu, -"Axel Springer" -döpfner 

If you get what i mean. You might make the possibility of me (and others) opening Axel Springer media even smaller.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I heard it's not the upper class that's going there

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think that would fit McKinsey's style

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Actually billionaires' row is a different thing, Millionaires' row are those giant mansions and billionaires' row are those super skinny skyscrapers. Not sure if it's called that from the ground floor up or whether it starts at a certain floor though. Also not sure if they're on the same side of the park. Would be funny though, if Millionaires' row was in front of billionaires' row and it would only be the floors above the Millionaires' row roofs.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Fortunately, Charlie hasn't said anything dumb or racist in a year

What a great year, too bad all those other guys are still saying dumb and racist things. Really looking forward to when they'll be silenced.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not sure about this particular case but often roads still need to be able to provide access for emergency vehicles. But trees would be nice yeah.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Not saying i don't like seeing this post, but i have to say i'm a bit surprised a post that doesn't really fit in this comm also got 3-5x more upvotes than the stuff usually posted here.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The "article" is an ad posing like an op-ed at best.

[–] huppakee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I guess that's why they put not necessarily there.

view more: next ›