hotelbravo722

joined 1 year ago
[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 days ago

Dealership owners are already the worst kinds of scum. Dealership owners next to military bases are an extra level of lowlife.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 15 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Dodge Charger. Number one car for people either A) Too young to know better or B) Wanting to make the worst decisions in life.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 week ago

Then what is necessary violence? When does the rhetoric of an candidate of a major party come to the point when you can call it fascist?

Calling a politician who

  • Fetishes an imagined great past.
  • Claims immigrants are "poisoning the blood of our country"
  • Get policy advice from individuals who call themselves christian nationalists and Neo-reactionaires.
  • And has admitted to becoming a dictator on day 1 of his presidency.

a fucking fascist isn't being too extreme. Its calling a spade a spade and a duck a duck.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Why not? A Fascist getting elected president of the most powerful military force on the planet seems like a reasonable time to start rioting.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 week ago

Good, now get me off this planet.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 month ago

Not how economics work.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Agreed geoengineering is bad science/engineering IMO. You can't know what the long term effects would be until after its been deployed. The safest bet would be to just ditch fossil fuels but that's not as sexy.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 months ago

The land barons of CA are no joke. They are a problem that we are going to have to deal with one way or another.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 25 points 2 months ago (4 children)

As a born/raised/living Californian I can attest to the fact that its not California that is the problem. But as my ancestors would say it's "El Pinche Gringo's" that tend to be the problem.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago

Oh yeah in so many ways its a too little too late. The best time to have fixed this problem was 40 years ago, the second best time is now. Nothing will be perfect, and we are definitely going to get so many things wrong. All I am saying is that there is some hope for something better, just gotta keep focusing on that and try hard to not fall down the rabbit hole of existential dread.

[–] hotelbravo722@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I agree to an extent. I think governments or more accurately the civil servants in government are taking it seriously. I work with a local Doughnut Economics group and 2 years ago we couldn't even get the time of day, now the amount of calls and emails we have gotten from state, city & county officials is amazing. They want to take it seriously its just they don't know how. However in my experience I think they are starting to adequately freak out now, they are just keeping a straight face because "don't want the public to panic".

view more: next ›