gon

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] gon@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

Oh wow haha Had no idea those were the actual lyrics...

[–] gon@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Adding to the list...

[–] gon@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Fantastic image. Weird text... But great image.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I foresee a kiss next chapter. My guess is that they're just coming to terms with their sexuality. Do keep in mind they're very young in this and have been dating/friends for very long, so it's not quite the traditional rom set-up, I'd say.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

This is true. My own mod log is marred by a mod that called me a pedo for absolutely no reason. Feel free to check.

Then again, the number isn't necessarily the issue but the contents, right? Which we can also check and judge for ourselves.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This ch. was kinda weak tbh... Looking forward to the next one, though.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Hahahaha xd Maybe maybe...

[–] gon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago
[–] gon@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This post took a while to load for me and I didn't look at what comm it had been posted to, so I fully expected this to be a meme from !the_pack@lemmy.world.

[–] gon@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

I add things to my watch later playlist and then always forget to actually go back and watch them later.

I've heard people do that... I, for one, do go back and watch them! Eventually~ Though they usually last a few weeks at most, in there.

I've heard of Garbage before, I think, but I've definitely never heard of Gin Rummy, or any variety of Rummy for that matter. Gin Rummy seems to be a very American card game. My favourite games are Sueca and Olho do Cu. The latter has many names and it's definitely a variation of something else. To be fair, basically every modern card game is a variation of some other, older card game, that was itself a variation of some other, older card game, ad eternum...

[–] gon@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Love the art on this!

[–] gon@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Weird... It works for me, and I'm using Thunder too.

 

It's lots of fun to find poetry in the mundane.

When you just look outside and see something that speaks to you. I love it.

:D Feeling a little happy today.

3
Microwave (lemm.ee)
 

Today, I ate some microwaved sweet potatoes. This has made me believe that the microwave is the best cooking apparatus in the kitchen.

I make my rice in the microwave, my potatoes in the microwave... I know there's microwave cake too. You can heat water in the microwave, which is useful for a variety of things.

Very versatile. I had a great lunch today, by the way. Canned mackerel fillets, sweet potato, rice, pickles. Very nice.

7
Vindication (lemm.ee)
 

I've always thought Linus, from LinusTechTips, often came off as an incredibly conceited, annoying, and rude person. I don't know what it is about him exactly, but I've just always thought he acts in a very strange and off-putting way, which is a real shame, being that I love tech content on YT, and he's one of the biggest out there. I simply could never get into his stuff, because he just gave me such terrible vibes.

Now, I'm saying this, but so what? Right? I mean, getting bad vibes from someone doesn't mean they're actually bad, for one, and for two, I find it rather distasteful to just announce that you dislike someone for seemingly no reason. I did it because it relates to the rest of this post.

Today, I watched a video from Louis Rossman wherein he basically tore Linus a new hole. It's over an hour long, and while saying bad things about Linus isn't the only thing he does, it's what stuck with me. Watching that video, I was reminded of another video---a TikTok, actually---that I watched the other day, about Neil Gaiman. The TikTok was saying how, after Neil Gaiman was outed as a terrible person (apparently, while I have heard about this I didn't actually look anything up about him), tons of people came out of the woodwork talking about how they've always had an inkling about him, how they never really liked him, he just gave off bad vibes, and so on. The thesis was that, those people should STFU; if you knew he was shit, why didn't you say so before?

Upon watching Louis' video, I felt that same way. That weird vindication that my gut feeling was right about someone. Then, I felt incredibly silly.

Should I have warned people? I don't know, that seems so wrong. And for the record, I'm still withholding judgement on this particular situation, as I don't have nearly enough context---nor do I care enough to look it up---to actually judge anyone involved.

Then, I watched another TikTok, talking about Trump supporters being faced with facts. That's how it was framed, but the general idea was that, upon having their deep beliefs shattered, people tend to be in a very fragile emotional state, one that, if pressed, will often result in them lashing out. So, if you shatter someone's understanding of the world, and then keep pushing it with more and more evidence, they might just get angry at you. Basically, that was the TikTok. Now, I wonder if that other TikTok was just that. People are upset when others say this whole "I felt they were terrible way before" because they didn't see it, so it's like a deep belief that they held was shattered, and now you're just rubbing salt in the wound, so they lash out and get angry.

I don't know.

I'll just keep on not watching LTT.

5
Retirement (lemm.ee)
 

Today, I reviewed my financial goals for retirement. I decided to rethink this because of a variety of factors---including me having learned quite a bit since I first outlined my goal---, but mostly because I want to make sure I'm going where I'm headed.

What I found was that I was, for one, very optimistic about potential returns, and secondly, aiming for a number that's far too high. Well, "too high" in the sense that I need only much less; of course, I wouldn't mind reaching a higher number.

I adjusted my expected returns and my goal, and that actually severely cut the years that it would take me to get there. It's nice when you review your goals and realize you made a mistake that made things harder for you.

At this pace, which may or may not be sustainable depending on a variety of factors, and may or may not increase, depending on a variety of factors, I could retire by my mid-40s. About 20 years from now. That sounds unrealistic... But hey, it's fun to try, at least. We'll see how it goes.

I wouldn't be the first to achieve this.

I had a meeting about a grant, yesterday. It went well, I think. I'm almost certainly gonna get the extension. More money. I got paid yesterday too, and it kind of shocked me. I was expecting payment, of course, but it just felt like so much money. I felt like when I got paid the first time. I don't know why... Maybe I'm learning some gratitude for the things I have? I don't know.

5
Politics (lemm.ee)
 

Today (or maybe yesterday evening?) I responded to someone on Discord that had made an interesting comment.

They said something along the lines of their friends having criticized Donald Trump's "DEI Ban," and saying that he just wants straight white men in the federal government. Something to that effect. He then said that that's ridiculous, and he wishes his friends did more research (he was more condescending in his phrasing).

Now, I'm not American, nor a policy expert, nor had I heard about this DEI ban, but I have my notions about Donald Trump, and so I went to look it up, and read what was written about it on the White House website.

I wrote a relatively short message detailing why I thought that, in a way, it did seem like Donald Trump just wants straight white men in the federal government. I was much more nuanced than this.

I didn't get a response because, almost immediately, a mod sent a warning about how there should be no political discussions on the server. Now, I don't think that's a great idea, but I get it and I respect it. However, I did notice that, while the warning was wagered against both of us, it was only enacted upon my response. That is to say, had i just ignored that comment, there would've been no warning. Somehow, the comment wasn't considered "political" enough to be worthy of a smite.

Here's my issue: that comment was very much a political statement. The implications that they agreed with the DEI ban were clear and obvious. I also know this because the person that made those comments has made other similar, though unrelated, remarks that made their position on certain issues rather clear. For example, recently, they denied that what Elon Musk did was a Nazi salute. They've said other things too.

I guess this whole post is just me venting my frustration that lies fly and truth crawls. It's so easy to just say anything, just make an implication, an insinuation, and just move on.

"Oh my friends are so silly to think that Trump is racist and sexist! They don't even understand the DEI ban! These terms just get thrown around like nothing these days..."

But to make a point in retort I have to actually say something of significance. Otherwise, it's just slinging shit. "Actually, he is racist and sexist" "Huh, you're just like them! Name one time he was racist and sexist? You can't!" And then I have to do the work. I have to cite. And then they can just say "that doesn't count" "you're misinterpreting" "that was a ROMAN salute!"

It's ridiculous.

Isn't this also what dog-whistles are? Plausible deniability, basically. Say whatever you want, except what you mean.

See, I don't mind political discussion. I have been turned away from some opinions by discussion, I'm not afraid to admit when I'm wrong; I welcome corrections, I want to improve. My issue isn't that someone disagrees with me, not even that they may be wrong or misinformed themselves, it's that they're either too cowardly to say it, or too daft to defend it and too attached to renounce it.

This reminds me of Ben Shapiro. Debating college students with his machine-gun mouth like it proves anything other than the fact having a bunch of prepared points against randos and talking over people gets internet points.

Pricks.

3
Gambling (lemm.ee)
 

I was watching a gambling video, on YouTube. It's a compilation of these two guys---I don't know who they are, though I've seen one of them before---just losing, and losing, and losing everything in online gambling. It's crazy the amount of money they're throwing in the fire.

Thousands, millions of dollars, gone like that. Unbelievable, in that I would literally not believe it had it not been video-recorded. Insanity.

I wonder what it's like to just have such a strong compulsion to do something so destructive. I understand what it's like, a little bit, on account of my eating. It's really hard for me to stop eating, or to not eat, even if I know I don't need to. I assume it's similar.

I guess the difference between eating yourself to death and gambling your life away isn't all that much.

3
Shoes (lemm.ee)
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by gon@lemm.ee to c/gondaily@lemm.ee
 

I need new shoes.

I bought new shoes not so long ago, about 3 months ago, but I think I need new ones. The reason I say this is because I've been wearing the same shoes (those new ones) basically every single day. I do occasionally use the other ones, but only to take a walk or for a quick go at the grocery store, things of the sort.

I feel like it's not a good idea to just wear the same shoes constantly, not very hygienic either, I'd gather.

I've been looking online. I've found a few shoes that seem really cool, at reasonable prices. We'll see how it goes.

Also, it seems I really will be going to Barcelona soon. Exciting... NOT! It's gonna be lots of work... I HATE WORK! Oh well, hopefully it'll be interesting, at least.

 

Perfect rice is hard to make.

Said NOT ME!

I have mastered the art. Well, my parents gifted me a Tupperware rice cooker for Christmas and I've recently managed to optimize the cooking process. By that I mean I found the exact time it should be in the microwave. 22.5 minutes, for the rice I bought.

Comes out great every time.

:D

 

I love sashiko. Both the philosophy of repairing your own clothes, the idea of visual mending, and the awesome designs.

However, my pants aren't ripped. My shirts are intact.

Of course, I could make a hole in them just to mend it, and I could add sashiko for purely aesthetic purposes, but that simply doesn't please me nearly as much as mending would. I want my things to last forever, but I want them to break so I can fix them as well.

I got new jeans, today. I bought them a week-or-so back, they arrived on Friday, but I only got to go pick them up today. They seem to be exactly as advertised: very well maintained, correct sizing, no blemishes or rips... They're perfect. The colour is just as I thought it would be, too. I bought these jeans to replace some previous jeans that no longer fit me, after I lost weight.

Perfect condition Levi's 501s for €20. I wonder if that's actually a good deal. It feels like a good deal, and I guess that's what actually matters. If I take good care of them---and watch my line---these two jeans might be the only pants I'll ever have to own. That sounds a little unlikely, but I guess we'll see.

22
Aging (lemm.ee)
 

I was with my grandma today. She's old, over 70 years old. I love her to bits, but her age is really showing.

She's slow, completely behind the times, everything hurts all the time... She's still a sweetheart that cares for her family, but this is kind of freaking me out. I want her to live forever, but I can see that she really won't.

I suppose all I can do is appreciate the time we still have together, and that's what I intend to do.

Remember to talk to your loved ones!

2
Infidelity (lemm.ee)
 

I'm not looking to get into relationships. Quite frankly, the idea of getting into a relationship with someone is a little revolting. That's a strong word to use, I'm aware, but I do mean it. It's stomach-churning to think of it, to think of getting attached to someone so strongly. I don't mean for this to sound insulting or demeaning, in any way; I have nothing against relationships, and people in relationships don't bother me in the slightest (my own parents are in a relationship, wouldn't you believe it).

Perhaps because I'm so closed-off to others, when I think of what would take for me to get into a relationship, I imagine a slow-burn sort of romance, so slow that it's like it's not even moving. The sort of romance that starts of as acquaintance and somehow turns into a friendship and somehow turns into a relationship, so slow that only as the persons are getting married do they realize that they aren't just acquaintances, any more.

Maybe I'm scared of commitment? I don't think I am; then again, I'm not a psychologist.

Speaking of commitment---something I planned all along, by the way, as I wrote the title of this post before writing even a single word of the post text---, what's up with cheaters?

I think some people take love very lightly. Or rather, they take relationships very lightly, and they don't really care about love. I met a cheater---I found out someone I knew was a cheater---and it shook me a little. Of course, I know people cheat, I know there are people that cheat, but to actually meet someone. He was bragging, too, I think. At the very least, he was not not-proud of it. It was weird. I just laughed and said "that's not good, that's terrible, that's really bad," but I think it came off as somewhat unserious. He's a colleague, so I don't want to make an enemy of him by shitting on his terrible actions. I feel a little stuck, in this situation, but I feel I did what's best for me.

The more I think about this, the more I think I'm actually very normal, on the inside. Which might seem really weird, having read this post, but I mean it. I think I'm very normal, but I just think about things in a very abnormal way. I think people do feel love, but while I think of relationships as an expression of that, most people just don't. They don't actually think of it that way... I don't know what it is, though, is it transactional? He doesn't love his girlfriends, that's for sure.

A VTuber I really like says she doesn't understand love and that, at some point, she just decided to define love for herself. She just sat down and said "this is love," and then that was love. Obsession, by the way, is what she defined it as. She's in a relationship, but she says she doesn't really "love" her partner, not in the traditional sense, but that she is madly obsessed with them, which for her is love, by definition. I can understand that, to be honest. It's rational and logic, even if unhinged and weird.

How can someone be in a relationship and cheat? It's just... It's so hard for me to wrap my head around it. I understand not wanting to be in a relationship and cheating; it's shitty but it's understandable. I understand being drunk or high or something and kissing someone without thinking and then realizing you did it and thinking it was awful and regretting it; it's irresponsible but not so immoral or anything, I don't think. Actively engaging in a relationship, being with someone strongly and unquestionably, and still wanting to be with someone else? I don't know, that's just so weird.

Well, I guess poly people exist, so there's that. I don't know.

Humans are complicated, I suppose. That's the conclusion I've come to. What a revolutionary thought-leader, I am.

 

Yesterday, my parents talked to me about the weather. More specifically, they were worried about how cold it is over here, as we've been dipping into the negatives. They insisted---quite intensely, might I add---that I get a heater for my room. I said I didn't need a heater, as I was totally fine with my current situation, but they even they wanted to pay for it. I can afford a heater, they know that too, but they were just really worried about me, and they're worried my goals are taking control of me and making it so that I sacrifice comfort to an unreasonable extent.

Which is not true, of course.

That got me thinking about social signalling, by which I mean what people understand about us by the way that we look, talk, and so on, rather than the facts of the situation.

I think fashion plays a big role in this. I think my parents perceive my sense of fashion to be rather... Laid back, let's put it that way. Careless. Bummish. Admittedly, it is so. Now, I've decided to revolutionize my wardrobe for unrelated reasons, but I do see a change in perspective as an additional and very much welcome benefit. Wearing well-fitting jeans, clean and fashionable shoes, a nice jacket or cardigan once in a while? I think they see that and get good vibes, and I'm hoping they'll worry less. If I look put-together, they'll think I'm put-together, and stop harassing me about the weather. That rhymed. Whoever said prose is paragraphed poetry was correct.

Have I mentioned I bought new jeans? They should arrive soon. Tomorrow, or next Monday. Can't wait to try them out. The Levi's 514s I mostly wear now are really nice. Running the risk of being uncouth, allow me to mention, I do enjoy the way my butt does uh-look in them jeans. These ones I bought now are 501s, like the first ones I got and have since ingrown---lost weight, I wanted to use the opposite of outgrown but that is not what ingrown means.

And with that, I bid you

Adieu.

view more: ‹ prev next ›