Sorry, I don't use Latex and am entirely unfamiliar with it, I mostly use org-mode to export to HTML where CSS would be used for this. This Stack Overflow thread says you can add :align |c|c|c| to #+attr_latex to get columns. Apparently column groups also will add these lines, which works in the ODT export but not the HTML one so may work in the Latex one.
This blog post has a walkthrough on using an alternative table extension that may be helpful.
Weird, are they getting overridden by something else in your config (a package or something). In an org-mode buffer, what's the output of C-h v org-export-with-sub-superscripts?
Edit: worked out the issues, I wrote the one of the variable names wrong, it should be org-export-with-sub-superscripts not org-export-with-superscripts
You need to use a symbol, not a string:
(setq org-export-with-superscripts '{}
org-use-sub-superscripts '{})
write something like this:
log_{critical}_{error}
That's what you'd need to write to have subscript, with the above set:
log_critical => log_criticallog_{critical} => log~critical~First of all: how can I turn of the need to manually stop the code execution for code blocks when exporting
From the docs:
You can prevent Org from evaluating code blocks for speed or security reasons:
- To speed up export, use the header argument ‘:eval never-export’
- For greater security, set the
org-export-use-babelvariable tonil, but understand that header arguments will have no effect in this case.
The next thing is, that my function names include underscores, which in orgmode translates to making the following text lowercase.
Do you mean subscript, like HELLO~WORLD~? Also from the docs:
If you write a text where the underscore is often used in a different context, Org’s convention to always interpret these as subscripts can get in your way. Configure the variable
org-use-sub-superscriptsand/ororg-export-with-sub-superscriptsto change this convention. For example, when setting these variables to{},‘a_b’is not displayed/exported as a subscript, but‘a_{b}’ is.
conversely, feddit.uk is a LEMMY instance. They run a custom UI frontend and backend both currently based off of version 0.19.17 (UI: 0.19.17-2-g4f0da5f5 & BE: 0.19.17-feddit).
For anyone curious, the modifications aren't that significant. The two UI changes are adding an explicit referrerPolicy to iframes and detecting avif files as images. Backend has more changes like blocking NSFW stuff, enabling image proxying for lemmings.world and some user agent stuff.
Gender as a term has existed since the 14th century, the distinction that gender = social/cultural aspects and sex = biological aspects is a recent phenomenon, but still predates the internet. The problem with 'biological male' is it actually doesn't tell you anything, it's just a way of calling someone a man with plausible deniability. Are you talking about chromosomes, sholder-to-hip ratio, hormone levels or any of the other biological stuff we conceptually tie to sex? And what is the BBC referring to when calling this unnamed woman a 'biological male' (they're not referring to anything biological, they are calling this woman a man).
also, right from the article disproving your annoyance…
They're referring to the nurse, not the trans woman. The part I quoted is literally the only time the article refers to the trans woman.
transgender woman - who was born a biological male - after she addressed them as "Mr"
The BBC sure have got the 'not technically misgendering' thing down to a science, calls her a 'biological male' (nonsense term made up by internet activists) and refuses to use she/her pronouns for the trans woman.
How is this the way I first heard about the results‽
Firefox is now exclusive to ternary computers.
Famously they’ve been very successful where come from - Sheffield - but have absolutely nothing to put to their name following a long-reigning green party mayor of the city … other than some postulating and participstion in reality shows.
(Actually i would credit the green party’s success here with the delay to Sheffield getting an improved metro system, which is now only going ahead under a labour-led Combined authority for the entire county.)
He held a, what Wikipedia calls, ceremonial post for one year? The Greens also only had 8 councillors and Labour a majority, so this criticism feels very misplaced.
Maybe if the title was clearer that this was a nomination thread there'd be more engagement, because it does currently look like just an announcement post. !anime@ani.social and !canada@lemmy.ca did that and more people are joining in there.
Apology rejected.