I don't really get why the M8 is remembered so fondly but the M7 isn't.
Is it just that way more people bought the M8? The M7 was truly innovative and the M8 was only a small iteration on top.
The UI strings make it pretty clear this is an option the user can choose.
It's not an assumption. They obviously have telemetry that shows the vast majority of people never turn Bluetooth or WiFi off.
According to IDC, the top three smartphone brands last year were Apple (20.1%), Samsung (19.4%), and Xiaomi (12.5%).
Moto only has 4% market share currently...
feature where the screen turns on when the camera detects motion.
Using a camera as a motion sensor doesn't count as not using a motion sensor IMO.
Why is it a deal breaker? Synthetic benchmarks don't mean anything. The real world experience of using a Pixel is faster/smoother.
It probably wasn't reported. I'd wager the percentage of devices with multiple profiles (that doesn't include Android for work) is probably very small.
Aren't there a bunch of improvements for foldable devices?
Also, there are a lot of security and privacy changes forced on developers when targeting API 34 that will help protect end users without them knowing.
Qualcomm has announced that it's working on a RISC-V chipset for Wear OS
I've given it some time, but I just don't like the new logo. I don't really understand the need to make it so simple that it no longer really resembles anything.
Could be worse. 25 cents in 1938 is still only worth $5.44 today.
evo
joined 11 months ago
Yes, worst clickbait title I've seen in a while. Health Connect was announced 2 years ago...