dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

oh yeah, none of this is new observation - but now it's the VCs admitting the 2+2 that we can then add to make 4

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

looking into this, but as far as i can tell the AI here is entirely fake

need more to declare it such

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

looks like a billionaire group chat collective delusion, see also return-to-office

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago

they're Thiel creatures. This is why (a) they're in all the papers all the fucking time (b) no other pronatalist couple is

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've emailed Microsoft Investor Relations to clarify what they meant and why they didn't just say "percent" if they meant "percent". But if it had been 16 percent, they'd have been yelling it from the rooftops, and they haven't been.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 3 points 1 week ago

if you look through the "venture capital" category, you'll see a few where I start going off on this topic. I blame the AI bubble on these bozos specifically.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have been corrected - this is a coding unit in an engineering degree. Vibe bridge-building.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

I think that LW post is the example I remember, Veedrac insisting that mathematics holds even in the face of a "sufficiently intelligent" AGI

tho i think there was also discussion on rat-tumblr

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i'm not digging for cites, but i recall it was extremely hard to convince rationalists that even the ASI couldn't just break cryptography, because they don't understand maths either

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 5 points 1 week ago

Nadella said written "by software" "on some products" so he's barely making a claim

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 9 points 1 week ago

the only people it torments are rationalists, so my full support to Comrade Basilisk

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago

roko stresses repeatedly that the AI is the good AI, the Coherent Extrapolated Volition of all humanity!

what sort of person would fear that the coherent volition of all humanity would consider it morally necessary to kick him in the nuts forever?

well, roko

 

As spotted by @mountainriver

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXc9-oD_iFo - video

 

Thinking about how the arsing fuck to explain the rationalists to normal people - especially as they are now a loud public problem along multiple dimensions.

The problem is that it's all deep in the weeds. Every part of it is "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong."

With bitcoin, I have, over the years, simplified it to being a story of crooks and con men. The correct answer to "what is a blockchain and how does it work" is "it's a way to move money around out of the sight of regulators" and maybe "so it's for crooks and con men, and a small number of sincere libertarians" and don't even talk about cryptography or technology.

I dunno what the one sentence explanation is of this shit.

"The purpose of LessWrong rationality is for Yudkowsky to live forever as an emulation running on the mind of the AI God" is completely true, is the purpose of the whole thing, and is also WTF.

Maybe that and "so he started what turned into a cult and a series of cults"? At this point I'm piling up the absurdities again.

The Behind The Bastards approach to all these guys has been "wow these guys are all so wacky haha and also they're evil."

How would you first approach explaining this shit past "it can't be that stupid, you must be explaining it wrong"?

[also posted in sneer classic]

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7DZZuCi95o - video

my delivery was near perfect on this video, i'm very pleased

 

yeah i'm sure Matt Levine, qntm and Wildbow are gonna be champing at the bit to attend wordy racist fest

view more: ‹ prev next ›