Please try to disagree without gatekeeping (e.g. telling them their opinion is wrong).
Not gonna mod this comment or anything, just giving a warning.
Please try to disagree without gatekeeping (e.g. telling them their opinion is wrong).
Not gonna mod this comment or anything, just giving a warning.
Per rule 4: Can you correct the post title to match the article's? Neither the embed title nor the title on the article's page match the one used for the post. There's no archived version (yet?) to tell if the headline has changed since publication. If this is only the title in the app, then please be sure to use the title shown on the web since this is a link-sharing platform. Thanks.
Per rule 4, can you fix the post title to match the headline? I checked archive.org to see if it changed since publication, but it doesn't seem to have.
Article title: "Miami-Dade says Fla. budget derails funding for commuter train on Brightline tracks"
You can clarify that the Brightline tracks are between Miami and Ft. Lauderdale in the comments or post body.
Thanks,
If we really want to make sure that never happens again, that award should be $314.6m each.
Rule 2: Please link directly to the article being posted. If you wish to provide an alternate link, you may do so in the comments.
You're gonna have to be more specific.
Per rule 4, can you please correct the post title to match that of the source article? We do not allow editorializing in the post titles.
Thanks.
Rule 4: Post titles must be the same as the article used as source. Please do not editorialize in the post titles. Please feel free to resubmit using the actual article title for the post.
Edit/Update: Just noticed you fixed this. Post restored.
Yep, I totally agree with you. Just trying to address it head on while also appeasing as many viewpoints as possible.
This comment was reported for containing racial slurs. First off, thanks, good call.
That said, taking things into context and the fact that they're part of a direct quote providing historical context, I'm allowing the comment to remain for now for that reason.
@some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org If you wouldn't mind masking out the slurs (e.g. n----r), I think that might satisfy any potential concerns with regard to automods, content filters, or misunderstandings without diluting the gravity of the context it's providing.
Please try to disagree without gatekeeping (e.g. telling them their opinion is wrong).
Not gonna mod this comment or anything, just giving a warning.