ToastedPlanet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF

Poking at a person's insecurities can be one of the best ways to deal with bigotry and hatred. So very much exhaust.

I rewatched that Invincible episode the day before making this. My first thought was a beholder but a cyclops was a much better fit.

It's fine to not care about what other people think and engage with the other person in a discussion. Even then, there can still be value in our arguments for the other people on this website with us. Our discourse can be useful.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFpK_r-jEXg

As far this Onion video, we should engage in the relentless pursuit of the truth regardless of other people's opinions real or imagined. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't be grateful when someone is arguing for equality.

The conversations we are having on this public comment section are of course public. This can be observed by the fact that people jump in at different points of the comment chains in this comment section. Not to mention the fact we are having a meta discussion about the discussions. Also, most instances have some form of voting in their default views. So the audience is real.

What I find to be the common misconception is that because we are having this discussion over an artificial medium that somehow cheapens the discourse. However, this is a real discussion with real people about a topic that affects real people.

A primary goal should be to educate people. There's no reason why the discussion can't be entertaining. Usually this shouldn't be at anyone's expense, however we shouldn't tolerate intolerant people. The far-right have seen the internet as a serious means of communication and are using it as a way to spread their ideology to devastating effect. Making fun of these intolerant people is a necessary step to preventing the spread of disinformation. But making the argument on its own is great too.

I don't have the time or the energy to reply to every incorrect take or argument I see on the internet. And I typically read more than I write. That's probably true of most internet users. So I appreciate it when I see other people pushing back against intolerant ideologies. Especially in this case, where the bad faith was so explicitly apparent. No one person could fight back against the right-wing infosphere by themselves. Defeating intolerant ideologies and educating people is a group effort.

Is a rat's tail like a monkey's paw?

Also, I lost track of your username. I thought I was arguing with another person in this chain. So anyway, thanks again! =)

That's prudish. It's the 21st century. This is a beach in America and it's fine.

https://i.insider.com/5773e4c8dd089531228b4d84?width=700&format=jpeg&auto=webp

I want equality for all. You have to work so hard to try to fight that, it's silly.

What you're ranting about is what men do all the time all over the place, because it's no big deal. It eventually will be that way for everyone.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

However something tells me that it’s not a problem and most people do not care if it wasn’t ever even voted on.

No, actually people want equality. We've been fighting for it for centuries. We'll be fighting for it as long as there are people who want to take it away.

Loud minority screams “I wanna go naked on the streets”

Men go topless all the time. The fact you need to bend over backwards here is an obvious demonstration that you are not arguing in good faith. @splendoruranium@infosec.pub, do you see what I mean?

“oh no I have to put my shirt on before going out, this is fascism”

More of the same. Really stunning to watch a person tie themselves into knots for the sake of inequality. Some people really do hate women.

Go to the beach and there go topless all you want. That’s what I do anyway. We collectively agreed that this is where it is fine to do so. Or on your property, you can walk even completely naked all you want.

Women should be allowed to go topless wherever men can. See how it's trivial to describe when the goal is equality. It's inequality that adds needless complexity.

Radical gender centrist

This really says it all. The word you're looking for is misogynist.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You being horny isn't a justification treat women as second class citizens. Grow up.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Because some people are not arguing in good faith. Sometimes it's best to call them out on what they're doing so people learn to recognize the behavior.

This comment section is not the first time this topic has been thought about and discussed.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Some of these users are unironically repeating rape cultural word for word and in this case with the add on of "I'm just asking questions". Thanks for sticking it to them. =)

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago (21 children)

It is sexist because you're treating them differently based on arbitrary cultural standards. Why are you pretending made up social constructs are real? We shouldn't be consistently sexist. We should want equality for all.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Saying 'women shouldn't go around topless' isn't allowing society to function. It's sexist and demonizes women's bodies in a way that promotes violence against women. Deconstruct your society or don't, but don't be surprised when you end up in a death camp because you thought it was fine to give second class person status to half your population.

[–] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This meme was based on a lot of things, but this article definitely covers what the owner class has considered. They are expecting us to die.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2025/apr/13/end-times-fascism-far-right-trump-musk

 

Disney Lorcana doesn't have a digital version - outside the fan-created Pixelborn - and that is a genuine shame. Mobile versions of TCGs especially tend to do extremely well from both a commercial standpoint and as a streamlined onboarding process for new players. A free-to-play version of an already extremely expensive hobby allows those who aren't willing to splash a lot of cash on a TCG they may not like to give it a try.

 

Ravensburger has revealed the next set of releases for the Disney Lorcana Trading Card Game: the pet-themed Archazia’s Island, available in Starter Displays, Booster Boxes, and the Illumineer’s Trove starting March 22.

The Disney Lorcana TCG: Archazia’s Island Starter Display will include eight Starter Decks, each deck having 60 game cards and 11 tokens along with a single Booster Pack.

 

With the release of Azurite Sea in November 2024, there are currently six Lorcana sets. The current gap between sets is about three or four months. While not as breakneck a pace as games like the Pokémon Trading Card Game - which this year released eight main series expansion sets and four special expansion sets - Lorcana still has a healthy amount of new cards to keep players interested. As of now, 2025 will be giving players two full new sets and some additional releases to go along with them.

 

If you’re cracking packs to find the most valuable cards in the set, you’re going to want to know what to look for. While there are plenty of high-value enchanted cards in the set, they’re pretty rare compared to most other cards, which is why we took a look at everything that’s in the non-enchanted rarities to find the slightly more obtainable cards that will still fetch a pretty penny.

view more: ‹ prev next ›