Themadbeagle

joined 2 years ago
[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

There are at least 4 different ones around where I live. I know, because they are all wrapped in different colors. One unwraped, one blue, one red, one white, and one black. Its astounding that many people bought it out around here

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

5/10 show your work next time! /s

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is what is so fascinating to me about most people, they don't understand that companies hord their assets in my different kinds of investments when they are this large. Having real estate gives them an asset they can can store large sums of money in that generally appreciate in value over time. If a company is under finacial duress, they can fire a bunch of employees, then sale the land where those employees worked and and save themselves from much larger losses on revenue for a given time period.

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

You do understand that large corporations invest in many kinds of assets in order to diversify them right? Real estate is one of the oldest investments any entity can make, and is often considered a pretty strong investment. Everyone needs land right?

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 34 points 10 months ago

Lol, "my personal anecdotal story, means someone else is crazy and wrong, despite me having no other evidence either."

  • This person
[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Take my breakdown with a grain of salt, as I did not dig into all of it, owing to the quantity of citations. Picking some at random, I found a mix between sources contemporary to the time period and ones that are secondary. I did not check the relevancy of the wiki quite, this was just 15 minutes of snooping around.

This one was interesting as it claims it was minutes from a meeting of a contemporary society called the the American Philosophical Society.

[103] Ord, George (1840). "Minutes from the Stated Meeting, September 18 [1840]". Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. 1: 272.

They still seem to be running to this day, and sound like they have a long history in the US. Not to say they are trustworthy, I know nothing about them.

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 13 points 10 months ago

It will not, because those laws already largely exist. It has been quite well established I'm the US that inciting violence is not considered protected speech. The laws just don't apply the same to wealthy people like Trump as they do to anyone else.

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Let take this as an example that just blindly saying things "worked" in the past means we should keep doing things the same way

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your edit gave me a chuckle

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Always got to love victim blaming. It's always a class act.

[–] Themadbeagle@lemm.ee -3 points 11 months ago

Be mad then I guess lol

view more: ‹ prev next ›