An individual of refined taste, I see.
SaltSong
joined 1 month ago
The one does not flow directly from the other. A better world requires some protecting from each other, which means giving up some freedoms. A system of complete and total freedom would not be good for most people.
However, as Franken said, it is important not to give up essential freedoms. What freedoms, exactly, count as "essential" ones? Hard to say. We should have a thread to discuss it.
That's petty awesome looking.
And really into witches.
Isn't everyone?
No, it isn't.
What does that have to do with my claim?
I don't know if you've noticed, but a lot of the trouble in the US was caused by people using their freedom to do terrible things to people, and to set the stage for more of the same.
Provided they don't touch freedom to not breed, and we don't put racist ducks in charge, I think that works be the easiest for me to bear.
But I don't want kids, so it's not much of a sacrifice.
Me, if you used restoring the Roman Republic.
Win98SE was my favorite. Maximum just working, minimum trying to "help."
Also wouldn't work with the internet.
I remember being very frustrated by this particular implementation.
The 90's kids who bypass the old rules are the same ones trying to implement new rules.
If words matter, I'm curious to know what definition of "deporting" you are using to claim that what they are doing is not deporting people.