SaltSong

joined 5 months ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, that's like claiming that he lied repeatedly and vociferously that jumping in the pool will not lead to getting wet. There is no way to believe that lie aside from deep, deep ignorance.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Also violating their consent.

Every time I make them put their shoes on. Make them do their homework. Eat their vegetables. Be home at a certain time.

Parenting is all about violating consent. Children get input, not veto rights.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I remember and author, possibly Pratchette, decrying the phrase "I don't believe my eyes." Believe them or not, they are how you perceive the world, and you cannot act much in contrary to what they tell you.

Ditto your ears, your senses of touch, smell, taste. Realistically, you can choose which of your senses to prioritize, but you cannot reject their input entirely.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That seems incredibly unlikely.

Once again, I long for precidented times.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

If I didn't remember, then it would be not meaningfully different from the life I live now.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 61 points 2 months ago (4 children)

But the media is going to split coverage. There will be very direct comparisons of crowd sizes. Some people will have to decide which event to attend, as they can't attend both.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The cultural relationship with time is more important than its absolute measurement.

This was the statement at the top of this discussion. It values the local concept of what time should be over an objective measurement of what time is.

The proposed change wouldn't cause much of a problem. But the idea under the statement I quoted would.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

that is such a small edge case that it’s not necessary to talk about them

Did you manage to overlook this point?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In general, stay out of the ducking way.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

And in both cases, missing the point. Categorize based on the chemistry, not the source of the chemical.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 2 months ago

That would kind of miss the whole point.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 4 points 2 months ago (7 children)

That's an untenable position. I mean, Cocaine is a plant, too.

view more: ‹ prev next ›