I understand why vegans would be unhappy with that answer but it is the way it is.
I don't. Veganism is about the fact that humans can live without animal products, which is true. Not accepting that actual carnivores exist, even being unhappy with this means you're well in extremist nutjob territory.
And we absolutely wanted to shoot the tester who gave us this use case.
Why? Because he tested well and broke the software? A user changing their mind during a guided activity absolutely is a valid use case.
They still sold more of it, easily making up for the slightly higher cost.
For real. Waiting until Halloween to introduce them to the deliciousness of caramelized onion...
Yes. It's far more than "a little weird". It's how you breed nationalists.
More like:
Computer scientist: We have made a text generator
Everyone: tExT iS iNtElLiGeNcE
Use a password manager. Won't forget passwords anymore.
Why can't they just say they want to date you?
Because direct rejection hurts. An ignored hint only disappoints.
Now make him freak out again by telling him peanuts aren't nuts.
Still far better than a proprietary kernel made by a tech corp, carried hardly changed from release to release, even fewer people maintain, and if they do they might well be adding a backdoor themselves for their government agency friends.
Always keep in mind that you heard about it in the news. So it was a news-worthy event.
People call stuff like Lemmy, 4chan or Reddit social media too but to me it's always these Facebook or Instagram style self-presentation platforms. All of them suck ass.