So is lemmy.ml breaking the law in brazil right now? And rather then laughing at the notion, you think it's a good thing? Yea you should probably change your name to Avatar of Fascism.
PowerCrazy
joined 2 years ago
So you are telling me that when Israel makes their definition of "anti-semitism" illegal that everyone in the entire world that uses the internet has to abide by it? That doesn't seem desirable or sane at all.
In 2014, after years of debate, Brazil's Congress ratified Law 12.965/2014, the Internet Civil Framework. This law required social media companies to delete posts and deplatform users who broke Brazilian laws. However, it placed the burden on Brazilian courts to identify the posts and accounts.
Is this meant to apply to all "users" of the platform or only Brazilian Citizens?
If it applies to Brazilian Citizens, that's all fine and good. But if I break brazilian law by criticizing their government, is lemmy.ml expected to "deplatform" and "censor" me?
AoC. Literally any "female" with good policy since much like Clinton and Harris, their gender was the least important part of their loss.
They can’t stop bots on any of the other sites they regulate either.
Why not? They are doing edge caching, they can literally just block the connection from visiting the site just like they do with their DDoS mitigation.
He campaigned as a socialist, he turned-coat a few months into his first term.
Source: Trust me bro. I'm super sexist and also friends with super sexist people and I can tell you that my super sexist bro's yearn for tax cuts for entrepreneurs who run a business for 3 years in a disadvantaged neighborhood. Trust me bro.
Agreed, no reason to give them reprieve. Let them try again and this time the gerontocracy is weaker then it has ever been.
You should replace the middle pic caption with "hates everything about driving, but will never admit it."
Wow! I can't believe he doesn't condemn Hamas!
Wait what? Israel is prosecuting Netanyahu? And if Israel doesn't stop the prosecution(?) then we will cut off aid to Israel? This doesn't make any sense what-so-ever.
That is the natural extension of your line of thinking is it not? Which users are "persecutable" by brazilian/Israeli law? If it's not just the citizens of Brazil (which i'm ok with, obviously a nation should be able to pass laws that apply to their citizens) but everyone "persecutable," doesn't that mean that a country that is sufficiently able to persecute anyone in the world is now justified to enforce their laws upon the entire world?