[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah. It isn't about cheating, fairness, who got in a lane first. Isn't territory to defend. We don't have to enforce rules on each other. The traffic planners and road crews went through a bit of effort with like signs and cones and shit to tell us where they want us to merge. Zippering helps everyone go faster. Kinda why the planners want us to do it.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Old reruns of Alf.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

I think you might be letting the dead off too easy just using the current population. You think we all just fell out of a coconut tree?

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Simple, orderly zippering when a lane actually ends is the way. Wasting that useful pavement to create slower traffic and more traffic jam is insane and should be ticketed.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

I presented a position on the topic. You ignored it in favor of discussing my comment's tone.

As for the concept, I considered it decades ago. The math was the same then as now, and time has only added those decades of supporting evidence.

Ridicule of the ridiculous is warranted. And characterizing ignoring the reality of political systems as stomping one's foot is the mildest of ridicule. It isn't bullying. If you weren't dismissing the facts in surewhynotlem's comment, then I'm glad you accept them.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Yeah, people make up bs, other people spread it, old guy embarrasses himself saying it on tv, bomb threats. I have to be missing a step here.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Everyone should just ignore their actual incentives. Wow. What a wonderful solution to collective action problems; why didn't anyone ever think of that before? Come on. I don't believe you are that stupid.

They gave facts and you dismiss them with a label because of a little ridicule? Your ending suggestion doesn't even do the job... we can grant you the impossible, sure all those people vote third party. Result, still a loss, and their least preferred major party wins. Whoops, all those voters we granted you picked different third parties. Because as little as they barely agreed on preferring one of the major parties, they agree on a ranking of the "third parties" even less. If you ask for us to grant the impossible, at least make it one that would work.

This is currently a multi-tiered 170,000,000 people system we are discussing. History and mathematics are against simplistic appeals for quick changes. Propose childish thinking, and it is little wonder you get ridiculed as acting childish.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Are We Ready For This Site's Endless Feed of AI-Generated Piped Links?

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I don't know. Seems pretty cowardly to me. So does asking for delayed trial dates.

[-] Magnergy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

(continuing the headline)... And Produce Some Sweet Album Cover Art

view more: next ›

Magnergy

joined 1 year ago