I'm sure in addition to what's been publicly stated as happening right now being indefensible even to the most in-denial people out there (at least out of those who want to be able to believably claim they care at all about human rights), it helps that in the UK at least, cases have been moving forward against war criminals with dual citizenship. (Identified "veterans" of the genocidal campaign have been charged elsewhere as well but I haven't heard how those cases are progressing yet.)
LostWon
joined 2 years ago
Actually, from recent reports I've seen, it seems it's Smith trying to save her own butt because much of her party wants this and is at risk of splitting up if they don't get their way.
She's said a referendum would be an "outlet" to let them feel heard, but she's obviously playing with fire. (Fwiw, Smith says she isn't for secession herself, but take that as you will.) If she was responsible and cared at all about her province and country, she'd be trying to put that fire out (aiming for a unity moment), rather than fanning the flames.
Oh, I didn't realize you were using colloquial English there.
Actually, "lay" is the past tense of "lie," AND "lay" is a separate verb from "lie." Most people will incorrectly (for formal English anyway) confuse the two verbs, using transitive "lay" when they mean to be using the intransitive "lie." (E.g. "She lays down" is not a valid conjugation in formal English, and should be "She lies down." If she's putting something else down though, "She lays it down."
Here are the respective conjugation charts for both verbs, if you want:
- https://www.wordreference.com/conj/enverbs.aspx?v=lie
- https://www.wordreference.com/conj/enverbs.aspx?v=lay
In some regional or cultural dialects though, maybe it's all "lay?" I grew up with (and taught) more formal English but I do try to respect established differences in standard Englishes (as long as I'm aware of them). :)
*It'd be "lies" for present tense, but "lay" is correct for past.
No it isn't. For the benefit of anyone not intentionally being cold and maybe just having some trouble putting themselves in others' shoes, I'll go on.
I'm not from the US, but I completely understand the extreme hurt, alienation, and disillusionment described here. I've felt it myself too, from here in Canada. The sense that an entire country might as well have just rejected you personally, with the rise of all those "anti-woke" campaigns and--despite what it should have meant for them-- seeing white women and other people of colour willingly vote in increased numbers (within their respective demographics) for patriarchal white nationalists (along with the poor and middle class once again voting for the least favourable party toward their interests).
That kind of added alienation (because there is always some background alienation to start with, especially for black women) within a land that should feel like your own home, and from people you thought should theoretically have your back? It makes you feel unsafe. It makes you feel like a scapegoat on top of that, when you start hearing talk from DNC people about how they have to stop caring about equality so much. The question arises of whether anyone-- as a matter of principle-- truly cares about justice for you, when you always cared about it for them.
I don't know how long it will take, but for a lot of people, all the hope that was crushed will have to be replenished.
Absolutely. The name changes are because reactionaries keep attacking those names and progressives keep on not standing up to these attacks and defending those terms.
Of course, deep-pocketed folks who want to divide the people are funding reactionary messaging but I'm getting to think more and more the bigger problem is that those on the people's side who would best communicate these things are exactly the ones who don't have the time and energy to be involved in communication. So instead it's either inadvertently condescending talk-downs or wishy-washy and corporate-sounding slogans from people who might just a bit too far removed from the actual problems at hand.
I have seen the aftermath from when someone rolled her foot in platform heels. (I was nearby, but didn't see her foot go perpendicular to her leg like I heard about afterwards.) It was many years ago and I don't think of it often, but I don't recall ever buying any kind of platform shoe ever again after that.
If someone can get evidence for this, it should arguably be grounds for treason.
Horribly vague headline, but excellent piece as far as I could read for now (not feeling well today and my head's starting to hurt). I look forward to reading the rest of the details on those recommendations. I hope the party listens to this kid!
I thought so too at first, but then got to this part and learned it's not the first time:
Luigi Mangione is getting the Roxie Hart treatment.
The accused murderer will be the subject of a new musical set to premiere next month in San Francisco, titled Luigi: The Musical.
Also appearing as characters in the musical will be two of Mangione’s fellow inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center - Sean "Diddy" Combs and Sam Bankman-Fried.
The play is already sold out for its entire run.
The premiere comes 99 years after Hart - a fictional character based on accused murderer Beulah Annan - made her Broadway debut in Chicago.
Annan, like Hart, was ultimately acquitted of murder.
Absolutely. Major media is helpful only to confirm basic facts, while touting stale and one-sided opinions, so we need to make inroads in other ways. Folks who are good with memes can tear into the CPC's lies about who they've really represented from the beginning (while also tearing into the LPC's failures to live up to their promises). Meanwhile, connected folks in blue collar industries and services ideally could get more facts out. It is a big problem how well-meaning professionals-- who tend to snatch up party leadership positions-- regularly and routinely disrespect and alienate other working people without even realizing it.
I just happen to have watched this earlier so I'll indulge you this time.
Scheer is letting PP stay at the official opposition leader's well-staffed Stornoway mansion instead of taxpayers funding his family moving out, just to fund them moving in again when he likely wins in a by-election. Even the commenter in the video says that part doesn't matter and it's a non-issue. He also goes on to say it's a shame the PM's residence at 24 Sussex Drive hasn't been renovated in a long time, experts are saying it's "unlivable" but Trudeau and possibly Carney are afraid of political blowback for spending money on fixing it up.