I think that's the joke. "First off, I really am not into meme coins or crypto or any of that bollocks."-" Got it, thanks meme coin guy"
Kratzkopf
So yeah, saying the moon is 1/400 the size of the sun is laughable.
I personally think that the word size is ambiguous enough not to imply a volume ratio. Actually when the context is the apparent size of an object in the sky, I imagine that the diameter is the first thing that comes to mind. (Or to be more exact the second thing just after the apparent area of the object in my field of view which is directly related to the diameter.)
Weiterer Tipp: Zwiebelhälfte ((())) erst ||| schneiden, aber nicht senkrecht zur Brettchenoberfläche von oben, sondern radial zum Zentrum und dabei nicht ganz bis durch zum Brettchen schneiden. So werden die Würfel gleichmäßiger und halten besser zusammen. Dann Brett um 90° drehen und senkrecht schneiden.
That's very cool. They grew the NbSe2 between a graphene monolayer and SiO2 to prevent degradation. I'm looking forward to reading the actual paper when I have more time and access to see what precursor they used to work well in that small space and how they enabled growth in that 1nm gap.
Edit: NbSe2, not NiSe2
Hä, das hängt am ~~Scheißenden~~ Kunden. Da steht doch für alle zugänglich ein Teller zum Deponieren von Kleingeld. Wenn die Leute so geizig sind und dem Reinigungspersonal keinen Lohn gönnen, der zum Leben reicht, kann da ja Sanifair nichts für ^/s falls nicht offensichtlich^
Edit:
Zudem sollen Svetoslav P. und die Mitangeklagten das sogenannte Tellergeld einbehalten haben.
Ok, selbst diese scheinheilige Legitimation ist nur vorgeschoben.
I think it makes sense to pick up arguments for views you oppose and address them properly in an essay, although I think that should serve a proper analysis where you give those arguments a fair chance, but also have the freedom to point out their flaws.
But I always felt that arguing for any view, assigned by chance, like in debate clubs for example, gave way to accepting a certain ambiguity of truth. Being confronted with different arguments and weighing them is an improtant skill to be learned and if your analysis is set up to reach a certain conclusion, it strips you of the open-endedness, that is actually needed.
Ich erinnere mich vage, dass um 2013 rum Anglizismen ein tatsächlich ein großes Diskursthema waren. Bei dieser Liste frag ich mich aber wirklich, wer die zusammengestellt hat und auf den Gedanken gekommen ist, dass die dargebotenen deutschen Wörten akkurater sein sollen als ein aus dem englischen entlehnten Fachbegriff (z.B. Unterdrückung/Mobbing, Großrechner/Server). Auch ulkig find die Anglizismen, die entweder schon ewig im Deutschen verbreitet sind und/oder gar keinen rein englischen Ursprung haben wie 'Video'.
This doesn't really sound convincing to me. For one the scenario
what kind of person would turn down such an offer
implies that the only rational behavior would ever be to go for big chunks of money. I'm not at all convinced, that that is a much healthier attitude than trying to have the company you built up often with loads of work continue to operate according to your (ethical) standards. And then there is the people buying the company, which will with acquisition be actually in the exact same position to have this company completely for the sole purpose of profit. That draws a worse psychological picture in my book. I also really don't think that it is so easy to get a business going so that it becomes growing and worth a billion dollars like you make it sound.
What I've found annoying with smart TVs in my family is also their start up time. Displaying the company logo for a minute before you can actually do or display anything is for some reason much more annoying than turning on my ten year old TV and then watch the even older laptop boot into xubuntu for a minute.

Vollzeit ja, aber doch nicht bei vollem Lohnausgleich🙄