I didn't realize this was controversial. Are you intending to educate with a sufficiently sourced counter narrative, or are you trying to appear as a wretched, intellectually dishonest sectarian? At this moment I see a lot from the second category and nothing from the first.
Juice
My book club reads this one https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/isaacs/1938/tcr/index.htm Note: its depressing af
Yep. GrapheneOS
The big hospital chains are just as bad, if not worse
Just as our founding fathers intended
I've definitely heard that from people and I appreciate the visceral quality of books. The smell, the feel, writing in the margins with a Dixon Ticonderoga pencil.
I used to try reading on my phone, but I can't read more than like 80-100 pages on it, at a certain point I just can't bring myself to do it. Probably a similar thing. So the e-ink is 1000% better than the phone. Also small to medium sized books are fine but if I'm reading 1000+ page doorstop the kobo is great.
It's just a perfect record. No filler, nothing is forgettable or boring, every song fucks. Ill def listen to this today now
Libgen, but I have a kobo e-ink reader and 90% of what I read is nonfiction
This was like my favorite song from age 16-29. Still an absolute banger
Cherub Rock is the best intro to any record. Turned all 3 of my teenaged kids into SP fans in the first ~~15~~ 60 seconds, same as me, same as my whole generation
Why yes I do read theory
I asked for education, I got whatever weird non-marxist trip you are on.
Looking at your post history, I noticed this: https://hexbear.net/comment/4750389
If you weren't such a goofball, you'd have heard of uneven and combined development. Sectarian is the opposite of revolutionary.