Yes my narrative fills in the blanks of what actually happened in Butler PA, but it absolutely is not conjecture. I explain how all of the REAL things that happened in Butler PA that are public knowledge all fit together and make sense. Nothing is conjecture. The school roof was in clear view of the rally, yet outside the “official perimeter” and trump’s SS was set up in its direction with a clear view of the roof. Crooks, a loner trumpee who liked guns and had previously participated in rightwing military propaganda as a younger kid, was witnessed on the roof by multiple rallygoers approximately ten minutes before the shootings. There was a man in black filmed on the watertower directly behind Crooks during the shootings. This is all available online, including the aerial layout of the rally grounds. There is no motive for Crooks. There is no evidence Crooks fired his gun. There is no evidence trump was shot. The fight fight fight was against human nature. It was staged. None of this is conjecture. Do better please.
GrassCat
There is zero evidence that anyone fired at trump. There is zero evidence Crooks fired his gun.
That’s just defensive adolescent reduction to absurdity from you. No pigeonchess please.
My narrative stands up to criticism. The “official nonstory” does not.
And I did. I stated that you cannot find fault in my narrative. If you provide a narrative other than mine, it is likely faulty because it is contrived.
My narrative adds up. Yours does not.
You can literally see that trump’s SS was set up facing Crooks before the shooting. Crooks was in full view of trump’s SS where he was positioned on the school roof.
I watched trump rallies all summer. They took a week-long break before Butler, and at the preceding rally, trump told an OANN reporter, “We’ve got something big planned for Butler, you don’t wanna miss it.” What was big? The giant fakenews immigration graphic. When trump gave everyone the cue to turn to the right, that’s when Crooks & Comperatore got murdered for trump’s staged photo op.
Because my narrative actually makes sense and adds up, unlike the “official” absence of a narrative.
Crooks was well-noted as a passionate righty. He had trump signs in his home yard the day he was murdered.
He was a friendless loner who went to the gun range frequently. Crooks had been in a Blackrock/Xe promo a handful of years earlier.
For “some reason,” trump’s SS said the school roof where Crooks was murdered was “outside their perimeter,” even though it was in full view of the rally. Since the SS knew this, why would they allow Crooks to be seen by the public on the school roof with a gun for approximately ten minutes before the SS killed Crooks? Because Crooks was “security help.” And there was a guy in black on the watertower behind Crooks during the shooting. This is documented by multiple witnesses.
Bro there are no “facts” available anywhere about the staged murders of Crooks & Comperatore.
What have you accomplished in your life to assume you’re more credible than me? Seriously.
What “proof” do you hold to believe the “official narrative” over what I said really happened? Where is your own proof for the alternative narrative you believe?
Nope. Your “contrived story” fails to explain why a lifelong trumpee with trumpee yard signs would have any motive to kill dotard.
I believe the man on the watertower behind Crooks shot those rallygoers.