FiskFisk33

joined 2 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I disagree, lots of things are much cheaper and worse.

Clothes are much cheaper and far worse. Power tools are generally a lot cheaper bit also built to break.

Houses are somehow more expensive AND lower quality though.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need to be more careful with context.

That's Richard Ayoade in the picture, and he's a fuckin' national treasure.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

someone didn't read the article ;p

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago

What am I missing, hasn't this been in i3 since like forever?

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I dont understand that part. This has been a thing in i3 since forever

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 week ago

all the more reason for the allegory

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

What happened?

edit: never mind, i should learn to read the fucking article hah

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Insurance companies too exist to make money. If their customers generally went plus, the insurance company would go out of business.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 2 weeks ago

That's a normal distribution. The average is right in the middle, at the peak. Being in the "top 65%" means 35% of people have a lower score.

couldn't be clearer.

on the bright side, even if this were a really good test, 94 is probably within margin of error from true average.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

was a Japanese geisha and prostitute who murdered her lover, Kichizō Ishida

lover is a wild choice of word there

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

nice job blindly taking the comment at face value while completely ignoring the context.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

that seems, inefficient

view more: ‹ prev next ›