[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee -4 points 1 day ago

people like you, frankly, disgust me. You are selfish and lazy but don't want to admit it because you don't have the willpower to change, so to convince yourself you are good and avoid responsibility for your immaturity you to hide behind a manufactured righteous indignation by moralizing autonomy, pretending to care by removing any responsibility you have towards others and towards society. But I see right through your pathetic facade. You don't care about sex workers, you're a selfish P.o.S that doesn't want to care about them, so you disguise your apathy as a twisted form of altruism. Grow up, you imbecilic child.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee -1 points 1 day ago

haha clearly I don't know. but from the few comments who actually tried to address my question, it seems to be a much more visceral thing. I guess rooted more in attraction than anything else. which answers my question in its own indirect way I suppose.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Sophia Artang is fake.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

agreed. just for the record so nobody plays the "you never denied it" card: I'm totally opposed to antisemitism, I denounce discrimination on the basis of any ethnicity, race, or gender in the strongest possible terms.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

I corrected it. I didn't mean in an ethnic sense, I meant in a foreign policy sense (like, Trump is very pro-Israel, and I happen to think that Israel manipulates the U.S. and we need to stay the heck away from them).

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

this was super helpful!!!! thank you!

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

thank you haha. duly noted.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Those are 100% augmented.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah there is no single explanation for revolution. Looking strictly to wealth distribution is reductionistic at best. I mean, wealth distribution was arguably better in the U.S. in the 1860s than it was in the prelude to Revolutionary France and yet we had a Civil War lmfao. There are endless examples that disprove this rule. The reality is: popular unrest is extremely complicated, and the factors that lead up to it are varied with fluctuating levels of influence at different stages of development. Sure, perception of wealth is a key component... but its hardly an explainer.

[-] ChildeHarold@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

that's the thing that pisses me off: the tax often increases the perception of how much people are willing to spend. even if you remove or decrease the tax, the companies just inflate the price to fatten their margins. Rule #1 of capitalism: the consumer always loses.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ChildeHarold

joined 1 week ago