Archangel1313
Well, that's awfully vague.
I don't know, man. Sounds like something a DEI hire would say. /s
When will Dems learn? they can't win without the progressive vote
Fuck that! There's way more MAGA voters than progressives. You gotta go where the numbers are. /s
"Procedural error"? As in, they accidentally allowed a progressive to win?
Priceless, if true.
Maybe they aren't including the time spent scrolling. It's just the sphincter flexing moments that count.
Whelp. It appears I am a robot. I guess I don't get to find out what my fellow boys are up to. smh.
(Edit).. apparently I can't even spell "bots" correctly. I'm failing all the tests today.
Man, why are you even having this argument when you are this ignorant about what these terms mean?
Do you understand the difference between "lethal" and "non-lethal" in the context of basic crowd control tactics?
For that matter, do you understand the difference in classification between a "protest" and a "riot"?
And are you even aware of your rights in either of those scenarios, and what tactics the police are authorized to use?
Because if you don't understand these concepts, then you are simply bullshitting your way through this conversation. And at this point, it really seems like that's the case. If you do understand these concepts and are still making this argument, then you are being completely disingenuous.
As I said...if you aren't going to argue in good faith, then what's the point? You're just pretending to be stupid, at this point.
Buddy, you're the one not arguing in good faith, if you are saying that rubber bullets and live rounds are the same thing. If you don't understand the difference between lethal and non-lethal ammunition, then you're right...there is no point in talking about this any further.
More like, to test whether the US will follow article 5.